Analysis wanted

Sort:
CPawn

This is a game i just completed this morning and i have to say im pretty proud of it.  I would really appreciate any and all analysis, suggestions, criticism, etc.

pskogli
CPawn wrote:

This is a game i just completed this morning and i have to say im pretty proud of it.  I would really appreciate any and all analysis, suggestions, criticism, etc.


 I like your spirit, but 3.. c6 is not so good, if white had played: 3.c4 then c6 is really good, and e6 is fun too (Iceland gambit).

But as the game countinued, you plaeyd really well! 7.Bxc6+ is a big mistake, white should not go for pawns when you have this kind of development advantage.

For a moment I thougt that white actually could hold the position after 8..Bxf2! but, the Rook e8 move will never work (to pin your queen after you take the knight on e5) Nice game :)

CPawn
pskogli wrote:
CPawn wrote:

 

This is a game i just completed this morning and i have to say im pretty proud of it.  I would really appreciate any and all analysis, suggestions, criticism, etc.


 I like your spirit, but 3.. c6 is not so good, if white had played: 3.c4 then c6 is really good, and e6 is fun too (Iceland gambit).

But as the game countinued, you plaeyd really well! 7.Bxc6+ is a big mistake, white should not go for pawns when you have this kind of development advantage.

For a moment I thougt that white actually could hold the position after 8..Bxf2! but, the Rook e8 move will never work (to pin your queen after you take the knight on e5) Nice game :)


 Thanks!  I checked out some of my opponents other games and noticed a common theme.  He trades everytime there is an opportunity.  So i figured id be aggressive. 

876543Z1

e4 d5 black attempts to wrest the initiative and you certainly did that, neat finish also, very well played. 9 Kxf2 would have been interesting I wonder how to continue and gain advantage for black. After 10 ...Re8! it was mayhem. Nice miniature.

>:) 

ZRH
[COMMENT DELETED]
punkmonkZ

Worthy Opponent (1672) vs. CPawn (1783)
3... c6 probably not enough
5. Nc3 instead > 5.d4 you now must prove something! 13....Qd4 looks ok
15...Qf6  not bad!  15...Qc5 does this work?

looking back< kinda pleasingCool