Forums

Aniko falls for 7 string conditional!

Sort:
mijfil
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Put myself in Aniko's shoes? Aniko is around 500 people! Have u ever calculated how much time is needed to play 3000 games? Lets think about that one, eh, no u haven't, I dont think a bunch of tired people sitting by desks all day really care about a forum in which one of them made a mistake. Besides I didn't try to offend here on purpose, if you want me to change the name just say.

mijfil
AfafBouardi wrote:
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Agreed.  Particularly putting her name in the thread title seems in bad taste and "falls for" is certainly denigrating.  

Of course, had her name not been part of this title, I wouldn't have bothered opening the thread.


Yes, good analyses, so the question is what should one do?If u got any ideas on how I could make the forum name nicer, just say.

fluffy_rabbit

"I won by 7 string conditional move!" for example

LoneWolfEburg

"Is there a refutation for this trap, Whipster?"

Just retreat the Knight to f3 and after Qxe4+ Be2 you are perfectly fine.

mijfil
fluffy_rabbit wrote:

"I won by 7 string conditional move!" for example


Hmmm, the next step is working out how to change the thread...

kerver73
Whipster wrote:

Who replies with f6 to defend the e pawn anyway?

Nevertheless, there is a trap for Black here:

 

 


Thank you Whipster,the best reply for black is Qe7 in that case and by this continuation black surely wins both the knight and the game...

Only to correct you,there is a trap for white here...

MathBandit
mijfil wrote:
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Put myself in Aniko's shoes? Aniko is around 500 people! Have u ever calculated how much time is needed to play 3000 games? Lets think about that one, eh, no u haven't, I dont think a bunch of tired people sitting by desks all day really care about a forum in which one of them made a mistake. Besides I didn't try to offend here on purpose, if you want me to change the name just say.


Do you have any evidence to support the fact you're accusing Aniko of cheating?  If not, shut up.

For the record:

5 seconds per move
->12 moves/minute
-->720 moves/hour
--->1080 moves/day (assuming 1.5 hours on Chess.com per day, which is far less than most spend, I would think)
----> 3240 moves/3days

Therefore, if Aniko is playing at simul-speed, then its VERY easy for one person to maintain over 3000 games, assuming all games are a minimum of 3days/move.

mijfil
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Put myself in Aniko's shoes? Aniko is around 500 people! Have u ever calculated how much time is needed to play 3000 games? Lets think about that one, eh, no u haven't, I dont think a bunch of tired people sitting by desks all day really care about a forum in which one of them made a mistake. Besides I didn't try to offend here on purpose, if you want me to change the name just say.


Do you have any evidence to support the fact you're accusing Aniko of cheating?  If not, shut up.

For the record:

5 seconds per move
->12 moves/minute
-->720 moves/hour
--->1080 moves/day (assuming 1.5 hours on Chess.com per day, which is far less than most spend, I would think)
----> 3240 moves/3days

Therefore, if Aniko is playing at simul-speed, then its VERY easy for one person to maintain over 3000 games, assuming all games are a minimum of 3days/move.


Alright mate, calm down. No need to be offensive, also you have to be pretty damn good to be able to spend 5 seconds and a game, It would probably take u ten to remember what is happening, If you are sane and push that up to one minute per move then it comes up as around 50 hours and assuming she plays 3 day games (which she dosen't, when i played her it was two days) and has a life she must have some sort of time travel machine. Good sir, for the record I think you have been destroyed, return home and bow your head in shame.

MathBandit
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Put myself in Aniko's shoes? Aniko is around 500 people! Have u ever calculated how much time is needed to play 3000 games? Lets think about that one, eh, no u haven't, I dont think a bunch of tired people sitting by desks all day really care about a forum in which one of them made a mistake. Besides I didn't try to offend here on purpose, if you want me to change the name just say.


Do you have any evidence to support the fact you're accusing Aniko of cheating?  If not, shut up.

For the record:

5 seconds per move
->12 moves/minute
-->720 moves/hour
--->1080 moves/day (assuming 1.5 hours on Chess.com per day, which is far less than most spend, I would think)
----> 3240 moves/3days

Therefore, if Aniko is playing at simul-speed, then its VERY easy for one person to maintain over 3000 games, assuming all games are a minimum of 3days/move.


Alright mate, calm down. No need to be offensive, also you have to be pretty damn good to be able to spend 5 seconds and a game, It would probably take u ten to remember what is happening, If you are sane and push that up to one minute per move then it comes up as around 50 hours and assuming she plays 3 day games (which she dosen't, when i played her it was two days) and has a life she must have some sort of time travel machine. Good sir, for the record I think you have been destroyed, return home and bow your head in shame.


Fine, assume 10 seconds. Then she spends 3 hours a day on Chess.com, which is STILL less than I do.

You have no reason to possibly accuse someone of cheating.  So once again, come up with some proof, or shut up.

Pwnster

What is all this talk about 3000 games in 3 days?  From her stats page I have the impression she's played 5399 games in the past 19 months.  That comes out to 284 games per month, or approximately 9 or 10 games per day.  With her average moves of 20 per game, that means between 180-200 moves per day and if we give her a generous 30 seconds per move (let's face it, she loses 70% of her games) we are looking at only about 1.5 hours.  Maybe I'm missing something here.

MathBandit
Pwnster wrote:

What is all this talk about 3000 games in 3 days?  From her stats page I have the impression she's played 5399 games in the past 19 months.  That comes out to 284 games per month, or approximately 9 or 10 games per day.  With her average moves of 20 per game, that means between 180-200 moves per day and if we give her a generous 30 seconds per move (let's face it, she loses 70% of her games) we are looking at only about 1.5 hours.  Maybe I'm missing something here.


My understanding is she has about 3000 ongoing games, and that she moves once in each of them every 3ish days.

Pwnster

According to her stats right now she's only got 499 going on.

I guess at one time she had 3200 games going

broze
Loomis wrote:

I've never understood the joy people take in playing this game from the white side. You didn't actually do anything in this game (it's been played and shown hundreds or thousands of times).


People enjoy winning, it's not really that surprising.

mijfil
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Put myself in Aniko's shoes? Aniko is around 500 people! Have u ever calculated how much time is needed to play 3000 games? Lets think about that one, eh, no u haven't, I dont think a bunch of tired people sitting by desks all day really care about a forum in which one of them made a mistake. Besides I didn't try to offend here on purpose, if you want me to change the name just say.


Do you have any evidence to support the fact you're accusing Aniko of cheating?  If not, shut up.

For the record:

5 seconds per move
->12 moves/minute
-->720 moves/hour
--->1080 moves/day (assuming 1.5 hours on Chess.com per day, which is far less than most spend, I would think)
----> 3240 moves/3days

Therefore, if Aniko is playing at simul-speed, then its VERY easy for one person to maintain over 3000 games, assuming all games are a minimum of 3days/move.


Alright mate, calm down. No need to be offensive, also you have to be pretty damn good to be able to spend 5 seconds and a game, It would probably take u ten to remember what is happening, If you are sane and push that up to one minute per move then it comes up as around 50 hours and assuming she plays 3 day games (which she dosen't, when i played her it was two days) and has a life she must have some sort of time travel machine. Good sir, for the record I think you have been destroyed, return home and bow your head in shame.


Fine, assume 10 seconds. Then she spends 3 hours a day on Chess.com, which is STILL less than I do.

You have no reason to possibly accuse someone of cheating.  So once again, come up with some proof, or shut up.


Ten seconds! How long do you think a person needs to spend on their chess games to be a 1400, especially if they have 3000 and you don't know which one is which. Mate, you're digging a hole.

MathBandit
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Put myself in Aniko's shoes? Aniko is around 500 people! Have u ever calculated how much time is needed to play 3000 games? Lets think about that one, eh, no u haven't, I dont think a bunch of tired people sitting by desks all day really care about a forum in which one of them made a mistake. Besides I didn't try to offend here on purpose, if you want me to change the name just say.


Do you have any evidence to support the fact you're accusing Aniko of cheating?  If not, shut up.

For the record:

5 seconds per move
->12 moves/minute
-->720 moves/hour
--->1080 moves/day (assuming 1.5 hours on Chess.com per day, which is far less than most spend, I would think)
----> 3240 moves/3days

Therefore, if Aniko is playing at simul-speed, then its VERY easy for one person to maintain over 3000 games, assuming all games are a minimum of 3days/move.


Alright mate, calm down. No need to be offensive, also you have to be pretty damn good to be able to spend 5 seconds and a game, It would probably take u ten to remember what is happening, If you are sane and push that up to one minute per move then it comes up as around 50 hours and assuming she plays 3 day games (which she dosen't, when i played her it was two days) and has a life she must have some sort of time travel machine. Good sir, for the record I think you have been destroyed, return home and bow your head in shame.


Fine, assume 10 seconds. Then she spends 3 hours a day on Chess.com, which is STILL less than I do.

You have no reason to possibly accuse someone of cheating.  So once again, come up with some proof, or shut up.


Ten seconds! How long do you think a person needs to spend on their chess games to be a 1400, especially if they have 3000 and you don't know which one is which. Mate, you're digging a hole.


She has less than 500 ongoing games.
For all you know, she's a master.

Why do you still insist she's cheating, with no reasoning whatsoever, only because you can't play that quickly?

mijfil
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Put myself in Aniko's shoes? Aniko is around 500 people! Have u ever calculated how much time is needed to play 3000 games? Lets think about that one, eh, no u haven't, I dont think a bunch of tired people sitting by desks all day really care about a forum in which one of them made a mistake. Besides I didn't try to offend here on purpose, if you want me to change the name just say.


Do you have any evidence to support the fact you're accusing Aniko of cheating?  If not, shut up.

For the record:

5 seconds per move
->12 moves/minute
-->720 moves/hour
--->1080 moves/day (assuming 1.5 hours on Chess.com per day, which is far less than most spend, I would think)
----> 3240 moves/3days

Therefore, if Aniko is playing at simul-speed, then its VERY easy for one person to maintain over 3000 games, assuming all games are a minimum of 3days/move.


Alright mate, calm down. No need to be offensive, also you have to be pretty damn good to be able to spend 5 seconds and a game, It would probably take u ten to remember what is happening, If you are sane and push that up to one minute per move then it comes up as around 50 hours and assuming she plays 3 day games (which she dosen't, when i played her it was two days) and has a life she must have some sort of time travel machine. Good sir, for the record I think you have been destroyed, return home and bow your head in shame.


Fine, assume 10 seconds. Then she spends 3 hours a day on Chess.com, which is STILL less than I do.

You have no reason to possibly accuse someone of cheating.  So once again, come up with some proof, or shut up.


Ten seconds! How long do you think a person needs to spend on their chess games to be a 1400, especially if they have 3000 and you don't know which one is which. Mate, you're digging a hole.


She has less than 500 ongoing games.
For all you know, she's a master.

Why do you still insist she's cheating, with no reasoning whatsoever, only because you can't play that quickly?


First of all i am not insisting, merely suggesting, also all that stuff about 10 secs per move, eh, no, her avarage time per move is 1 day and more! Finally who are you to talk about playing quike, have you looked at your average time per move.

MathBandit
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Put myself in Aniko's shoes? Aniko is around 500 people! Have u ever calculated how much time is needed to play 3000 games? Lets think about that one, eh, no u haven't, I dont think a bunch of tired people sitting by desks all day really care about a forum in which one of them made a mistake. Besides I didn't try to offend here on purpose, if you want me to change the name just say.


Do you have any evidence to support the fact you're accusing Aniko of cheating?  If not, shut up.

For the record:

5 seconds per move
->12 moves/minute
-->720 moves/hour
--->1080 moves/day (assuming 1.5 hours on Chess.com per day, which is far less than most spend, I would think)
----> 3240 moves/3days

Therefore, if Aniko is playing at simul-speed, then its VERY easy for one person to maintain over 3000 games, assuming all games are a minimum of 3days/move.


Alright mate, calm down. No need to be offensive, also you have to be pretty damn good to be able to spend 5 seconds and a game, It would probably take u ten to remember what is happening, If you are sane and push that up to one minute per move then it comes up as around 50 hours and assuming she plays 3 day games (which she dosen't, when i played her it was two days) and has a life she must have some sort of time travel machine. Good sir, for the record I think you have been destroyed, return home and bow your head in shame.


Fine, assume 10 seconds. Then she spends 3 hours a day on Chess.com, which is STILL less than I do.

You have no reason to possibly accuse someone of cheating.  So once again, come up with some proof, or shut up.


Ten seconds! How long do you think a person needs to spend on their chess games to be a 1400, especially if they have 3000 and you don't know which one is which. Mate, you're digging a hole.


She has less than 500 ongoing games.
For all you know, she's a master.

Why do you still insist she's cheating, with no reasoning whatsoever, only because you can't play that quickly?


First of all i am not insisting, merely suggesting, also all that stuff about 10 secs per move, eh, no, her avarage time per move is 1 day and more! Finally who are you to talk about playing quike, have you looked at your average time per move.


You do not know what you are talking about.

Average time per move is not the time you spend looking at the board.  Hell, I've made over ten moves during this conversation.

mijfil
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
SensFan33 wrote:
mijfil wrote:
Gonnosuke wrote:

It strikes me as bad form to single out your opponent in the manner that's been done here.  Knowing the identity of your opponent doesn't really add anything to the conversation.  We all play the occasional howler.  Put yourself in Aniko's shoes.


Put myself in Aniko's shoes? Aniko is around 500 people! Have u ever calculated how much time is needed to play 3000 games? Lets think about that one, eh, no u haven't, I dont think a bunch of tired people sitting by desks all day really care about a forum in which one of them made a mistake. Besides I didn't try to offend here on purpose, if you want me to change the name just say.


Do you have any evidence to support the fact you're accusing Aniko of cheating?  If not, shut up.

For the record:

5 seconds per move
->12 moves/minute
-->720 moves/hour
--->1080 moves/day (assuming 1.5 hours on Chess.com per day, which is far less than most spend, I would think)
----> 3240 moves/3days

Therefore, if Aniko is playing at simul-speed, then its VERY easy for one person to maintain over 3000 games, assuming all games are a minimum of 3days/move.


Alright mate, calm down. No need to be offensive, also you have to be pretty damn good to be able to spend 5 seconds and a game, It would probably take u ten to remember what is happening, If you are sane and push that up to one minute per move then it comes up as around 50 hours and assuming she plays 3 day games (which she dosen't, when i played her it was two days) and has a life she must have some sort of time travel machine. Good sir, for the record I think you have been destroyed, return home and bow your head in shame.


Fine, assume 10 seconds. Then she spends 3 hours a day on Chess.com, which is STILL less than I do.

You have no reason to possibly accuse someone of cheating.  So once again, come up with some proof, or shut up.


Ten seconds! How long do you think a person needs to spend on their chess games to be a 1400, especially if they have 3000 and you don't know which one is which. Mate, you're digging a hole.


She has less than 500 ongoing games.
For all you know, she's a master.

Why do you still insist she's cheating, with no reasoning whatsoever, only because you can't play that quickly?


First of all i am not insisting, merely suggesting, also all that stuff about 10 secs per move, eh, no, her avarage time per move is 1 day and more! Finally who are you to talk about playing quike, have you looked at your average time per move.


You do not know what you are talking about.

Average time per move is not the time you spend looking at the board.  Hell, I've made over ten moves during this conversation.


But in aniko's case she would have to spend all her time on chess.com to be able to respond in time, also you have to factor in sleep, eating and breaks.

 

P.S the quote box at the top is just becoming ridiculous

MathBandit
mijfil wrote:

But in aniko's case she would have to spend all her time on chess.com to be able to respond in time, also you have to factor in sleep, eating and breaks.

P.S the quote box at the top is just becoming ridiculous


You still don't get it - there's more than enough time for all her games if she's willing to play simul speed, which she presumably IS doing.

mijfil

all this bullshit is starting to piss me off, how about we resolve this as men should do, would accept a 3 day chess game? I haven't the time to go on about how one of us are wrong for some reason that I've forgotten by now. So what do you say, yes or no?