Berlin Endgame, Bishop vs Knight, Winning by Triangulation (Including my analysis)

This is a blitz game I had.

I know how important it is to analyse your games to improve but until now the only thing I did was to check the game report chess.com provides after games. While this lets me know the blunders, it isn't advanced enough to provide plans. That you have to find by analysis.

So this is my first attempt at analyzing and annotating my games myself, Bobby Fischer style (at least I tried to do it in his style ). If you have a spare ten minutes, please go through the game and comment on the quality of my analysis or the moves played in the game. Suggestions to improve analyzing skill or my play are welcome from people of all skill levels. 

 P.S. I analysed a blitz game because that is what I play mainly on chess.com (and some 4pc) and I play rapid/classical only OTB. Also the way I play 5|5 here is I spend about 4 min trying to develop a plan in the opening/middlegame (mostly middlegame) spend a minute executing it with adjustments and then convert on increment (while this does sounds good on paper(screen) I do blunder and lose a lot). 

Also you may see that I throw around words like triangulation and zugzwang a lot as if I am some kind of super genius, forgive me if it is too annoying ,if it offends any true geniuses or if it is just unnecessary .

Hey here's the video!