Nice to see that some higher rated players actually commented on this; thank you. Though I don't understand how, people talk all about using engines for game preparation, so I tried it on this somewhat rare line and was confused by the results.
If the IM pfren is still following this. Can you explain why 5.Bd3 is white's only consistent plan positionally? If 5...Nc6, it's going to be hard to regain the pawn and I don't see how semi opening the c-file helps white. Also, recommend any books on the French?
White's intention is to develop rapidly, not regaining the d4 pawn (which is extra, and weak). He wants to keep the spearhead at e5 by all means, faithful to the Nimzowitzian dogmas. He MAY pick back the d4 pawn later if he has nothing better to do, but usually he just wants to create problems to Black in a different way.
See how a French defence expert handled the position as Black. Everything looks fine, engines applaud his approach, and yet, around move 25 white is better. Mrs. Stockova made a tactical mistake by 25.Be1 (it leaves f4 not well protected) and Black equalized, and later on wrapped the game up.
French book/books? Well, look for Moskalenko's.
They have plenty of mistakes (the author is not fond of engine analysis), but they are very pleasant to read, show a lot of nice ideas, and will make you love the opening. The absolute truth in position ABC means little at your level. Most of my friendsa snob these books, but all of them are stroing players- so they are a tad unforgiving about several things...
Nice to see that some higher rated players actually commented on this; thank you. Though I don't understand how, people talk all about using engines for game preparation, so I tried it on this somewhat rare line and was confused by the results.
If the IM pfren is still following this. Can you explain why 5.Bd3 is white's only consistent plan positionally? If 5...Nc6, it's going to be hard to regain the pawn and I don't see how semi opening the c-file helps white. Also, recommend any books on the French?