Brilliant Moves in New Game Analysis Report
Sort:
how to turn on the brilliant moves and all while playing in game
???
to see what type of move it is like brilliant or excellent in the review do we need to have the premium subscription ?
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/56652515?tab=review 7.....Bxa3 should be a brilliant
A brilliant move can actually be assessed by the engine. This topic is up to debate, but I had this proven when I faced off on a bot with assisted mode on. The engine's final decision was recognized as a brilliant move immediately. Therefore, I find that a brilliant move is something that looks a lot like a blunder, but the engine, looking ahead and seeing the advantage, shows that it is brilliant from the hidden advantage again. Usually, a brilliant move is a move that sacrifices a piece for more material, development, or checkmate much later on, typically without a clear path for a human to track, hence the "hard to find part", which usually happens to me within about 6 moves whenever I find one, such as a bishop sacrifice on the castled king.
deniaslwp wrote:
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/56652515?tab=review 7.....Bxa3 should be a brilliant
I don't see how...White simply blundered. Just because it's an obvious blunder doesn't mean your natural capture (not even a sacrifice) should be considered "brilliant".
No, brilliant move occurs when Chess.com cloud engine has a "sacrifice detection" on, which means they award piece sacrifices a lot (not including pawn sacrifice) . Even other tatics like zugzwang are not awarded chess.com "brilliancy". Furthermore, the brilliant move need not be the only winning move, and what more it may be the 2nd best move.
Also, when you run game review differently the results are differnet. For example, the app may show different move as brilliant compared to the browser. Furthormore, app self-analysis mode also has the feedbacks on, and they classify their move instantly, but can "change their mind". ALso on chess.com/event, chess.com runs Stockfish 15 NNUE that is in sync with the Game review. It is also more accurate when you run a higher depth of game review.
https://www.chess.com/events/2023-reykjavik-open/02/Williams_Simon_K-Rakhmangulova_AnastasiyaPressing on the "review" tab you see 2 brilliant move, which doesnt include leaving the queen en prise game review run by chess.com in sync with Stockfish 15 NNUE, whereas https://www.chess.com/news/view/2023-reykjavik-open-williams-sacrifices-queenthe article show someone personally game reviewing it having 3 brilliant move, including leaving the queen en prise, as leaving the queen en prise is not the top move recommended by the engine
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.