Bugs I dont understand

Sort:
BehopTodDani

How is this a thing

BehopTodDani

BehopTodDani

i dont get how it is repetition

RobiStefan12

me too

omnipaul

It is a repetition of position, not a repetition of moves. Take a look at the board state after each move that results in a repetition - they are identical. It doesn't matter how you get there, no progress has been made by either side.

Of note, for two positions to be identical, not only must the board look the same, but the same possibilities must also exist - if a player is allowed to castle in the first instance and then they move the king, then the second instance would not be a true repetition. Similar is true in the case of en passant being available in the first instance.

 

eric0022

Threefold repetition of position, not threefold repetition of moves.

Show us the full game.

EDIT: omnipaul has posted it, a few seconds before I submitted my post.

blueemu

Yes, the official chess rule regarding repetition refers to positions being repeated three times, not to moves being repeated.

You can draw by threefold repetition without repeating a single move... as long as the position has recurred three times with the same player to move each time.

xVesper
blueemu wrote:

Yes, the official chess rule regarding repetition refers to positions being repeated three times, not to moves being repeated.

You can draw by threefold repetition without repeating a single move... as long as the position has recurred three times with the same player to move each time.

Ok did not know that. Thx

putshort
Did you allow takebacks?
BehopTodDani

thx i didn't kow that