If it makes your "good moves" look bad, maybe you should go to analysis page to see why, instead of insulting that it made your move look bad? It's very simple, it can't be simpler: literally go to analysis page, and play computer moves for your opponent, and your potential responses with your pieces, and you'll see why your move is bad. I personally don't see any serious mistakes in Game Reviews, all my mistakes were true mistakes, and blunders were true blunders, I just messed up during the game. That's how you learn chess nowadays
chess.com should develop their game review system

If it makes your "good moves" look bad, maybe you should go to analysis page to see why, instead of insulting that it made your move look bad? It's very simple, it can't be simpler: literally go to analysis page, and play computer moves for your opponent, and your potential responses with your pieces, and you'll see why your move is bad. I personally don't see any serious mistakes in Game Reviews, all my mistakes were true mistakes, and blunders were true blunders, I just messed up during the game. That's how you learn chess nowadays
Thank you for your response .I also agree with you that there is no serious mistakes in the game reviews but there is some issues to solve.
I have been playing on chess.com for 2 years. There are some bugs and mistakes in game review.
For example: Sometimes it makes even good moves look bad.
I hope chess.com will consider it.