Could/Should either of us have won this?

Sort:
Avatar of GrandCheesemaster

Following my forum post asking for people to play against I got a huge wave of challenges, one of them from from FM Kacparov. Below is the game.

 

I want to know if there is any move that could have been played that would have resulted in a victory for either side, as well as any general advice anyone would have for me, or pointing out any general area where Kacparov didn't play as well as possible.
I wrote down my thoughts as the game was going on, and I will probly add my own analysis in a little later. Atm I am too busy being pleased with myself that I drew against Kacparov.
Thanks in advance for any response.

 

Avatar of ivandh

...it is really interesting to watch this with a messed-up cache, as you appear to castle with your third bishop which later becomes white's pawn.

Avatar of pathfinder416

22.Bh2 gives tactics to Black on e1 (Re6!, and White has problems).

Avatar of JG27Pyth
Mephisto wrote:

white's 22nd move was a mistake, as Bd4 allows black to pin the bishop, he can move it anywhere, for instance h2 and eventually he'll win a piece by Ra1


Bh2 is interesting but it's oddly hard to win the bishop outright (for instance...Bh2 Re6 Ra1 Ra6) But Black should get positional concessions of some kind, that Bh2 is a problem and Black should made to pay the steepest price possibly for it.   As played White lets the OP off the hook IMO.

22.Bh2 Re6 Ra1 Ra6 and white is making black squirm but he hasn't won the bishop yet.

Avatar of Kacparov

Laskerfan, the ending is absoluetly draws, even after your 36. h4 - I just play Kh7. And black could have played better earlier.

And I agree, 22. Bd4 was huge mistake and probably let the win slip away.

Avatar of Kacparov

It is all theory :-)

Avatar of Kacparov

instead of Kf7 I move Kh7