12719 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
In an effort to improve my chess understanding, I figured I would post a few of my games here for analysis. This game was interesting because my opponent used an irregular opening, that is, 1.e3. I responded with e5. I suppose the biggest help I could receive is in dealing with irregular openings. Did I play the opening well? The rest of the game is less than interesting... I trapped his queen, but he played on anyway. However, ideas regarding better use of my forces to gain the win will be well appreciated. There was also a knight sacrifice. I wanted to know if it was sound. Thanks!
edit:Haha, it appears that 20....Re4?? is a blunder. I thought that the knight on f3 couldn't be saved, but after 21.Bxe4 dxe4, 22. Ke2 threatens the bishop, which would leave me down the exchange. I suppose I got a little careless. If it persists as a habit, my chess playing skill will never improve :(
7...a6 was wasteful. In the opening you want all your moves to be development or center oriented unless there's a definite threat the keeps you from doing so.
If white played exactly what you were fearing it would actually have been a mistake for him.
8.h4is as bad as your reply (8...d5) is good. h4 has nothing to do with development or the center and it's definitely not giving him an initiative. Your move d5 gains some center, and is already threatening to open the position more with d4 which would be disastrous for white's undeveloped army.
The knight sac isn't best or necessary, but what I like about it is it opens the position. Of course after winning a queen and being up in development you can pretty much do anything you want.
wafflemaster, thank you. So, I suppose in the heat of the battle I got a little paranoid. I also remember reading an article on this site that showed that doubled pawns need not be a bad thing. It was The Truth about Doubled Pawns Part 5. It featured games by Mikhail Botvinnik, where his doubled pawns increased influence in the center. Anyways, thank you for the consideration to help this amateur grow :)
2/11/2016 - Casas-Piazzini, Buenos Aires 1952
by djlyndon a few minutes ago
Why does society hate chess?
by HueyWilliams 2 minutes ago
Proof White Trumps Black
by FirebrandX 2 minutes ago
Simple Endgame Position
by HueyWilliams 3 minutes ago
Is it possible to become a Master in under 6 months?
by HueyWilliams 6 minutes ago
Official Patzer Chess Championships - Followed by the top GM
by deathstroke2611 11 minutes ago
ChessBase use and Database Quality
by UseWithCare 12 minutes ago
by poucin 13 minutes ago
If Fischer played Fischer for the World Champion, who would win ?
by Fiveofswords 20 minutes ago
2/7/2016 - Quick And Painless
by silvia_trench 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!