Forums

do you think ¡ (aggressive move) should exist?

Sort:
Avatar of chess_and-checkers
chess_and-checkers
15 hrs ago
0
#1
Well, there are some icons that should exist, like !? (Interesting move), and zugzwang, but not like unexpected move (¿), etc. Here are some moves of aggressiveness:



Evan’s Gambit ( e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 ): Sacrifices a pawn to build a massive center and speed up development. So, b4 would be ¡ (aggressive move).

Danish/Nordic Gambit ( e5 exd4 ): Offers one or two pawns for rapid development and attacking bishops. In this case, two are aggressive. d4 and c3 are ¡ (aggressive).

Well, so far, I think aggressive moves SHOULD exist. I don’t care if you don’t agree, that’s just my opinion.
Avatar of Volt
Volt
14 hrs ago
0
#2

I think it's indirectly covered by "!?"

i agree, it might look better to assign all different icons to categorize the moves, but i think it's really fine and keeps things simple the way it is now

Avatar of chess_and-checkers
chess_and-checkers
3 hrs ago
0
#3
Chess.com never adds new stuff