Forums

Free High Quality Analysis

Sort:
Akuni
Akuni
May 4, 2009
0
#41

Yeah, something weird is going on with this forum topic, at least it is on my end, sukerpuncher, could you respost your game?

 

I don't know about you but I can't see it anymore.

Qwertykeyboard
Qwertykeyboard
May 4, 2009
0
#42
thefox31 wrote:
paul211 wrote:

I am not following you on your offer.

Your post title is : "Free High Quality Analysis", and you follow by saying: "
Very competitive, negotiable rates."

Where is the free analysis? For those that take the paying lessons?

I can submit one game only to you and if you can tell me free what I could have done differently to win or draw, I might consider your offer.

I am a 2200+ player and have played chess for over 45+ years.

You're also a pretentious ass. I have never seen a constructive post from you. Every single one has been fault finding, boastful and longwinded.

 

Akuni is stating exactly what he is offering. You understand this perfectly but somehow take objection? I urge you to try to find out why you feel compelled to do this. Insecure, sense of entitlement, whatever. But much more likely is you'll use your energy now to get angry at me, which is all the maturity you've shown previously.

 

I would have done this in a private message, but I felt Akuni, who IS helpful, polite and constructive, wouldn't mind being supported publicly.

 S-N-A-P!!

SukerPuncher333
SukerPuncher333
May 4, 2009
0
#43
Akuni wrote:

Yeah, something weird is going on with this forum topic, at least it is on my end, sukerpuncher, could you respost your game?

 

I don't know about you but I can't see it anymore.

 Yes, something got completely screwed up. My game was replaced by someone else's, followed by a bunch of links. But that's only if I use firefox. I tried switching to internet explorer and everything becomes fine. Try it and see if it works.

Akuni
Akuni
May 5, 2009
0
#44

Porcupine tree, this is your game, something's wrong with the game analyser. If it gets fixed then I'll redo this game.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. d4 d5 2. c4 e5 3. dxe5 d4 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. g3 f6!? ( 5... Be6 6. Nbd2 Qd7 7. Bg2 Nge7 ) 6. exf6?! ( 6. Bf4 fxe5 ( 6... g5 7. Bc1 fxe5 ( 7... Nxe5 8. Nxd4 ) 8. Bxg5 ) 7. Nxe5 Nxe5 8. Bxe5 ) 6... Nxf6 7. Bg2 Be6 8. Nbd2 Bb4!? 9. O-O O-O 10. a3?! Bxd2! 11. Nxd2 Qd7 12. b4 Bh3 13. Nf3 Rae8 14. Re1!? Bxg2 15. Kxg2 Ne5 ( 15... Qe6 16. Bb2 Qxc4 17. Rc1 Qf7 18. Bxd4 a6 ) 16. c5?! ( 16. Nxe5 Rxe5 17. f3 Qe6 18. Bb2 Rd8 ) 16... Qc6?! ( 16... Nxf3 17. exf3 Rxe1 18. Qxe1 d3 ) 17. Bb2 Nfg4? ( 17... Nxf3 18. exf3 Rxe1 19. Qxe1 Rd8 20. Rd1 d3 21. Qe3 Qd7 22. Bxf6 gxf6 c6! bxc6 24. Qxa7 ) 18. Qb3+ Kh8 19. Bxd4 b6?! 20. Bxe5 Nxe5 21. Rac1 g5? 22. cxb6! Qe4 23. bxc7! g4 24. Qc3 gxf3+ 25. exf3 Qd5 26. Rxe5!! Rxe5 27. c8=Q Rxc8 28. Qxc8+ Kg7 29. Qg4+ Rg5 30. Rc7+ Kg6 31. Qe4+
Akuni
Akuni
May 7, 2009
0
#45

LYCAN148, sorry for the delay, but here's your game.

 

Akuni
Akuni
May 8, 2009
0
#46

Bcguy, here' your game, for some reason I thought you were playing White, and may have referred to you as such. Sorry for any confusion.

 

 

quny
quny
Show your flair!
May 8, 2009
0
#47
quny wrote:

hello kuni  here is one of my games

 akuni hope u didn't forget about my game

Akuni
Akuni
May 8, 2009
0
#48
quny wrote:
quny wrote:

hello kuni  here is one of my games

 akuni hope u didn't forget about my game

I'm afraid I can't find your game.

quny
quny
Show your flair!
May 8, 2009
0
#49

its on post  #43

george1977
FM george1977
Show your flair!
May 8, 2009
0
#50

Very good comments by Akuni!

In Albin counter-gambit - game by SuckerPuncher333 - I think is safer 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 d4 4.Nf3 Nc6 5.a3 followed by 6.e3, etc., or 4.a3 and 5.e3, even though any lines with Bg4 are complex.

SukerPuncher333
SukerPuncher333
May 8, 2009
0
#51
george1977 wrote:

Very good comments by Akuni!

In Albin counter-gambit - game by SuckerPuncher333 - I think is safer 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 d4 4.Nf3 Nc6 5.a3 followed by 6.e3, etc., or 4.a3 and 5.e3, even though any lines with Bg4 are complex.

Man, this thread is very screwed up. That Albin counter-gambit game wasn't posted by me. We really need a staff here to see what's going on. In the meantime everyone, use Internet Explorer (not Firefox) to view this thread and it should be fine.

Akuni
Akuni
May 8, 2009
0
#52
quny wrote:

its on post  #43

Firefox seems to be working fine now, but posts 42-50 are lost. And sorry about the mix-up sukerpuncher I'll try to get your game.

SukerPuncher333
SukerPuncher333
May 8, 2009
0
#53
Akuni wrote:
quny wrote:

its on post #43

Firefox seems to be working fine now, but posts 42-50 are lost. And sorry about the mix-up sukerpuncher I'll try to get your game.

No problem. It looks like Internet Explorer can still recover posts 42-50. For example, I can still see quny's game from IE, but using Firefox it's lost.

SkillzTurtle
SkillzTurtle
May 8, 2009
0
#54

dont overflow the poor man! nice analysis, yes I do like your style.

george1977
FM george1977
Show your flair!
May 8, 2009
0
#55
SukerPuncher333 wrote:
george1977 wrote:

Very good comments by Akuni!

In Albin counter-gambit - game by SuckerPuncher333 - I think is safer 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 d4 4.Nf3 Nc6 5.a3 followed by 6.e3, etc., or 4.a3 and 5.e3, even though any lines with Bg4 are complex.

Man, this thread is very screwed up. That Albin counter-gambit game wasn't posted by me. We really need a staff here to see what's going on. In the meantime everyone, use Internet Explorer (not Firefox) to view this thread and it should be fine.

Ok I'm sorry, SuckerPuncher. Anyway there are no problems, people who plays counter-gambit Albin have received one comment, is that all :)

Akuni
Akuni
May 9, 2009
0
#56

Here Higgsboson (BTW, best name I've ever seen on chess.com)

 

george1977
FM george1977
Show your flair!
May 9, 2009
0
#57

Yeah Mr. Akuni, one or two comments :)

First, you must be exhausted :( - I remember the people, Akuni have commented many games! - and quality of analysis, really wonderful yet, is getting to fail. Is only my view (I'm a master too), and is normal, your efforts seems to me very grateful.

So, next comments are only any variations wich I think is not correct for help to people who have played these games. ONLY THIS! :) Others moves are very well explained - in moves and concepts, I believe -.

1) In 3.d4 variation your memory have "failed".. xD

Correct move (as you 100% know!) is 10.Bxf6 Bxf6 and only here 11.c3 with the idea Nc2-(e3), a4...

If not black can move 9... Nxd5.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2) 7.d5 (!) Cce7 8.a4! with the idea Bc4, as Akuni commented, I think is met by 8... exd5 (before bishop goes to c4) and if 9.Nxd5 Nxd5 10.Qxd5 then 10... Nf6:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3) 18.Nd7 and following moves is not completely correct because you're not winning a quality (rook is double-defended on d8). Because of this is not possible here 20.Nf6+ :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's all, congratulations for Akuni and best regards for all!

Akuni
Akuni
May 9, 2009
0
#58

You're right about the first and last one of course, my mistakes. BUt as to the second one, if Black had played exd5 then White plays exd5 with a fantastic position.

george1977
FM george1977
Show your flair!
May 9, 2009
0
#59
Akuni wrote:

You're right about the first and last one of course, my mistakes. BUt as to the second one, if Black had played exd5 then White plays exd5 with a fantastic position.

Of course, Akuni. Nxd5 is bad, was only for to see if was possible following with your idea with Bc4.

bs_liyan
bs_liyan
May 9, 2009
0
#60

Thank you for doing this;