I think the best games are these:
1.Kasparov-Topalov 1-0
2.Byrne-Ficher 0-1
3.Karpov-Kasparov 0-1
Greatest Game
Sort:
Extraordinary wrote:
I think the best games are these:
1.Kasparov-Topalov 1-0
2.Byrne-Ficher 0-1
3.Karpov-Kasparov 0-1
You know,in fact Kasparov has played several games agaaainst both, Karpov and Topalov and Fisher has won Byrne several times. Would you mind posting this games?(Byrne-Fischer probably already posted)
No problem kosmeg, here it is. Hope you like it, PS took my ten minutes.:
Chess_Champion26 wrote:
No problem kosmeg, here it is. Hope you like it, PS took my ten minutes.:
Be sure that I like it very much, but in a matter of fact I've posted the same game earlier in this forum...
Thanks:):):)
kosmeg,
I have seen that game before (Lasker v Thomas) and it is by far one of the best!!!
Thank you for sharing it.
i know this game's already been posted (as a link, though, not as a playable game), but i'm having a hard time understanding the brilliance of 19. Qa4. Did white not just get lucky? Black must have seen the opportunity to take white's queen...why not?
The answer must be incredibly obvious. I'm just not seein' it.
young_roy123 wrote: the diagram above me i dont understand why didnt white take the knight with his knight on move 11 can someone explain to me please its driving me crazy. and on move 15 take the knight again and why black gave the queen up. thanks again.
If 12.Nxa4 then 12...Nxe4 wins the bishop.
If 16.Qxc3 then 16...Rfe8 wins the bishop.(Not sure about that)
On move 17. blacj gave the queen because he took the bishop on c4 with a check, the pawn on d4 with a discovery check after 18...Bxc4+ 19.Kg1 Ne2+, the bishop on b6 with a threat to take the queen and after that the Rook on d1. That means that he took 5+3+3+1=12 for 9.
young_roy123 wrote: the diagram above me i dont understand why didnt white take the knight with his knight on move 11 can someone explain to me please its driving me crazy. and on move 15 take the knight again and why black gave the queen up. thanks again.
They're the masters, not you, there was a reason.
Jun 22, 2008
0
#31
Another pearl form Mr Van de Loo and Mr Hessling.25 years after they play again.
Here's another great one.