mrguy888 wrote:
Houdini is really weak. Just watch this sample game to see how weak it is.
white is not a piece up, 4. .. dxc6!
Houdini 2.0c pro retarded move
Sort:
Don't disregard a move because it "loses" a piece (or a pawn for that matter) wait and see what Houdini's resonse is. If we ended a game at every a material imbalance in our favour occurs, then the Game of the Century would have been lost some moves after the queen sack when we found out that there was no mate in the immediate (say 5 moves) future!
fritzricky wrote:
mrguy888 wrote:
Houdini is really weak. Just watch this sample game to see how weak it is.
white is not a piece up, 4. .. dxc6!
mrguy888's post is intended as a joke. If you notice the other games posted as replies to the OP have similar features. The OP claimed that Houdini was weak, but the OP did not see the continuation that Houdini is actually winning the exchange. The games posted as replies are mere jokes.
fritzricky wrote:
mrguy888 wrote:
Houdini is really weak. Just watch this sample game to see how weak it is.
white is not a piece up, 4. .. dxc6!
But then 5.Nxe5 Qd4 6.Nxf7, and I shut down the engine, since white is two pawns up, so apparently winning! 
RoffleMyWafflez wrote:
Nc7+ win queen
BorgQueen wrote:
Seriously, how can anyone rated 1800+ :
a) set up a computer position with the board the wrong way around
b) not notice problem a and post it on a chess forum
c) stop playing just when black can demonstrate a win claiming that he knows the game will end in a draw
d) post that it was the computer that was retarded
3p1c Ph41l
Well, given that:
a) This guy can't understand the continuation of the game, with black winning the exchange;
b) He has a 1900 rating, and achieved his best win against Computer4-IMPOSSIBLE (2246);
c) Every post he submitted is about computer engines:
I guess this idiot is obviously a CHEATER.
(This also explains the wrong setup of the board and the opponent named akhtaramin instead of inchiso.)
I think it's you, tkches, who have a slight problem understanding when someone talks seriously, and when not.
That's quite an accusation you're making there, pfren... I for one was absolutely serious.
I think the programmers were unable to comprehend chess or something:
Maybe they should have me on their team.
corpsporc wrote:
I think the programmers were unable to comprehend chess or something:
Lol at 2...Nc6 
corpsporc, Houdini won at suicide chess?
BirdBrain wrote:
corpsporc, Houdini won at suicide chess?
its draw cuz all peices would cancel each other. Chess engine sucks rybka 5 will be better maybe
Intrepid_Spiff wrote:
b) He has a 1900 rating, and achieved his best win against Computer4-IMPOSSIBLE (2246);
(This also explains the wrong setup of the board and the opponent named akhtaramin instead of inchiso
NOTE: I refrenced it as yahoo.chess (no chess.com) and inchiso dont exist in yahoo chess, Houdini 2.0c x64 6CPU is my test.testtest1917@yahoo.com or qwe.qweqwe16@yahoo.com and Programs used used chess buddy and not arena.
Remove comments plz
corpsporc wrote:
I think the programmers were unable to comprehend chess or something:
Maybe they should have me on their team.
i got similar results when i made it 100 milliseconds or 1 depth extreme low settings. lets see you play 100 milliseconds and oh wait.. nothin happens. chess engine is better than nothing (you).
Your trolling is ineffective when it is obvious and nonhumorous. Try going back to humorous.
inchiso wrote:
well i dont play chess, i use engine to play 4 me. so.. engine games allowed cuz i make houdini play without queen its very sad but i dont give a $%&*. So can i post engine games ? i was wondering what elo players has to be to be able to beat houdini cuz every player i know draw or lost playing houdini handicap (without queen). Anyone help?
That is taken from the OP's reply to another thread (see link). To the OP: even if you play here at chess.com or at yahoo.com, using chess engine is considered cheating.
i dont cheat, yahoo or chess. i no longer play chess.com for long time, only yahoo.chess and you can see me 1357 against 1536 (yes, yahoo chess players are good not noobs) in 5 min game. i dont use engines (rarely), only when players like corpsporc use abusrd language then let engine auto play and watch em die.
If you read the few serious posts in this thread, you would have seen that it wins an exchange.