It's a known fact that the programming here isn't great. Apparently they can't afford high class programmers. Such a shame.
Are "Brilliant moves" in computer analysis just any decent sacrifice now?
Sort:
Dec 23, 2023
0
#304
True, if a sacrifice is the engine's primary choice its brilliant
Dec 23, 2023
0
#305
my first brilliant was a king move which was the on the top 3 lines of stockfish depth 16 lol
Dec 24, 2023
0
#306
GMMOHAMEDKM a écrit :
[Event "Vs. Computer"] [Site "Chess.com"] [Date "2023-12-24"] [White "Intermediate"] [Black "GMMOHAMEDKM"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [WhiteElo "1200"] [BlackElo "873"] [TimeControl "-"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "3B3k/8/6Q1/8/4r3/P7/KP6/7r b - - 0 1"] [Termination "Draw by stalemate"] 1... Ra1+ 2. Kxa1 Re1+ 3. Ka2 Ra1+ 4. Kb3 Rxa3+ 5. Kc4 Ra4+ 6. b4 Rxb4+ 7. Kc5 Rc4+ 8. Kb6 Rb4+ 9. Kc5 Rb5+ 10. Kc4 Rc5+ 11. Kb4 Rc4+ 12. Kb5 Rb4+ 13. Ka6 Ra4+ 14. Kb5 Rb4+ 15. Kc6 Rb6+ 16. Kxb6 1/2-1/2
[There is actually a mistake by White]
Apparently a move being considered brilliant or not here depends on the rating of the player.
For a very low rated player all moves that do not hang material would be brilliant here.
RandomKaczka wrote:
I haven't got a single brilliant move ever before
me too
I got my first Brilliant Move (that I know of) today, it was a bishop sacrifice that lead to a me winning a rook after! (So I had 3+ material advantage)
Me too
Oct 5, 2024
0
#312
Elsam_u wrote:
Yo idk how to insert my games in forms bc I’m new can anoyoen teach? Pls…
https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8639952-how-do-i-put-a-game-or-puzzle-in-a-forum-post
Oct 13, 2024
0
#313
You know those countless back track mate puzzles where you check with the Queen, the Queen gets captured by a rook, then you recapture with a rook with mate? The Queen sacrifice is brilliant.
I got a brilliant move while playing custom with angry moo (evaluation and the one that shows how good your moves are)
I agree that the last position you give us is ridiculous. White needs to play Bd4 in that position but can first play RxR+ and then the Q check. It doesn't matter which way round and white is completely won in any case. It's total nonsense. The engine calculated that positionally, white is about half a pawn better after the pseudo-sacrifice than by playing the rook swap. (The reason for playing Bd4 is that the B could be trapped out of the game.)