How to play like an engine !

Sort:
Avatar of SebLeb0210

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=77118348

at move 3 : the engine says that it would be best that your oponent  would have played c4 instead of h3.

 

at your move 3 : it says that it would be best to play c5 instead of bf5.

 

at your move 7 : My engine says that instead of bxc5, you should of played qa5+ and then probably take the pawn with the bishop.

 

So at your move 8 : Instead of a6, nc6 would be much better says the engine.

 

at your move 9 : Engine says : Instead of nc6, Nbd7 would be more resonable.

 

at your move 10 : it says that instead you should of played bc6 probably for a better outpost and a better snipe on the white kings weak square.

 

at your move 12 : it says that you should of played re8 instead probably for center support to launch a minority attack ( a pawn avalanche ) .

 

 At your move 13 : Qe7 would of been better. Probably to evantualy play qd6.

 

at your move 16 : It would be more scope friendly to play bc7.

 

at your move 17 : it would be better to play rc7

 

at your move 20 : It would be more attacking to play rb8.

 

at your move 21 : better would be nd6. 

 

at your move 23 : More position friendly would be nd6

 

at your move 26 : More strategicly would be ra6.

 

At Your move 27 : more attacking and space conquring would be qd7.                                                                                        

At your move 31 : More safe would be Nf7.

At your move 32 : The engine requests qc7

At your move 33 : More pressuring would be rfa8

At your move 36 : More material wise would be just grab the pawn.

At your move 39 : You should of took with the pawn and save the move ne4 fore later.

 


 

Avatar of sisu

Let's make it happen!

Avatar of SebLeb0210

Because Fritz is good.

Avatar of SebLeb0210

I rwote this all by my own hand no copy and paste ! :)

Avatar of SebLeb0210

Yes !

Avatar of sisu

Let's make it happen!

Avatar of SebLeb0210

No, its possibly true that a self human can win against an engine Wink

Avatar of SebLeb0210

Or maybe I will be first... lol just kiding Laughing

Avatar of SebLeb0210
Yeah playing like an engine would be cool. But Then the live chess moderators would think that we would be using engines.
Avatar of SebLeb0210

yeah your right.

Avatar of Scottrf

Humans can't play like an engine.

Avatar of SebLeb0210

Yeah your right. But, humans didnt create the ways that the engine plays. The engine could take us over that way. They decide the power that they put in it.

Avatar of SebLeb0210
Scottrf wrote:

Humans can't play like an engine.

yeah I guesse so but they can play the same moves. but they probably will not think at it the same way.

Avatar of BMeck
SebLeb0210 wrote:
Scottrf wrote:

Humans can't play like an engine.

yeah I guesse so but they can play the same moves. but they probably will not think at it the same way.

Engines do not think

Avatar of SebLeb0210

I agree, but they need to remember.

Avatar of SebLeb0210

they need to remember that e4 leads to the kings pawn ect.

Avatar of buldermar
BMeck wrote:
SebLeb0210 wrote:
Scottrf wrote:

Humans can't play like an engine.

yeah I guesse so but they can play the same moves. but they probably will not think at it the same way.

Engines do not think

I think, therefore I am not an engine.

Avatar of SebLeb0210

I agree.

Avatar of BMeck

Enignes do not need to remember either lol. Its a program

Avatar of buldermar
BMeck wrote:

Enignes do not need to remember either lol. Its a program

That really depends on how you conceptualize memory retention. For instance, I'd argue that any engine based on an adaptive algorithm that stores previously played positions and adjust accordingly at least to some degree "remembers" by the definition of the word.