I can beat the engine at the strongest level (3200)

Something more aggressive, with some gambits

https://www.chess.com/game/computer/114936145

As Michael Jordan said "to win, you have to lose"

SHUT THE FLICKING FLICKY FLICK UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

like please

The weakness of the engines are:

The Stonewall Defense. Humans would play f3-e4 and break it, while engines will not.

A long-term advantage, such as a pawn or piece stuck at f6/f3 where the engine has castled kingside.

They don't see fortresses.

If you give them 5 bishops of same color, while you have only a queen, they don't see that you can checkmate by going on the opposite color to the bishops, with your king and queen, towards his king. They thing they're winning until it's mate in 3.

We have a whole thread on checkmates and puzzles that computers can't solve. They're called:

"Mates that are difficult for engines" and

"too difficult for computers".

They don't even understand how to win this as white:

And the forced mate is so simple, just walking the king over. No seriously come check out those two threads!

that's true, for example in this game against Stockfish at strongest level, I sacrificed my queen, but I preserved my two bishops and he thinks he is winning https://playstrategy.org/KHgu2ZnYMrXF

an 1100 rated player beating Komodo is some Dream luck right there

(if you can beat komodo, then why can you at least become a GM???)

You can't beat 3200 level, you're using stockfish 😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵😵

There's a video that I only watched the beginning of because seeing Nakamura's anti-computer technique in action made me a little demotivated to watch it.

With this topic it makes me think ok there are anti-computer techniques but do they really work against strong current chess program Hikaru Nakamura vs Komodo: Blitz and Rapid Chess Match (youtube.com)

If you beat Maximum without help ftom anything else, then why are you only 1200? Ik that you used others programs, though it's actually not forbidden

so what are you saying, are you arguing that he's cheating in online games? most people actually think in chess, and if it bothers you so much, check the game review if he won.

Look at this greek gift

https://www.chess.com/game/computer/115243645

I wonder if he plays in rated OTB tournaments and, if so, what is his rating?

Beating Komodo with 33 moves https://www.chess.com/game/computer/115413309

Beating Komodo with black https://www.chess.com/game/computer/115794059

lmao he just cheated its not that deep now stop reviving this thread

Nothing deep, here you have a game played today with moves very easy to understand, can you repeat the game and post it here? Do you know the meaning of cheating? If you cheat your account is banned, then why my account is not banned?

https://www.chess.com/game/computer/115946477

And here you have the same game with a small variation

https://www.chess.com/game/computer/115950231

You can practice against the computer for training purposes and this is allowed here. The computer will always do the same mistakes. That's the difference when playing against other users.

You won't get banned for cheating against the computers. You only get banned if you use an engine against other human players.

Yes, because if you cheat against computers you are not really cheating, because cheating means to use a computer against a human, in that case the computer is cheating against you, because it is using a computer against a human, however if you cheat against humans, you are cheating because you can't use a computer against a human. Very easy to understand.