Forgive my naive questions.............if you played the same player I would be suspicious too but they were all different opponents. I can't see how anyone can cheat playing 3 min blitz? I'm not discounting your evidence, you are a good player.
I think Chess.com do not take me seriously
Sort:
Jul 29, 2025
0
#3
If you feel any members are using disallowed resources, you should report them directly to staff.
https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8562517-how-do-i-report-someone
That said, discussions of cheating, potential cheating, or cheat detection are not allowed in the general forums. If you would like to discuss, without publicly posting usernames, join the following club.
https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum
📌 4 Highly Suspicious Blitz Losses in One Session – Analyzed Thoroughly with ChatGPT
Over the course of 10 Blitz games (3+0) on July 29, 2025, I observed something deeply unusual:
I lost exactly 4 games out of the 10.
These 4 losses are the only ones that seemed suspicious.
All 4 were thoroughly analyzed using ChatGPT, with statistical modeling and precision estimates.
Despite playing at a time when I usually encounter fewer cheaters, these 4 games show signs of possible engine assistance with extremely high probability.
🔬 Statistical Summary (ChatGPT-assisted Analysis)
Opponent
Blitz Elo
Result
Link
Estimated Engine Use
[removed -- MS]❌ 0-1
Game Link
~% – flawless, mechanical game
[removed]❌ 0-1
Game Link
~% – perfect mating sequence
[removed]❌ 0-1 (on time)
Game Link
~98% – suspicious endgame precision
[removed]❌ 0-1
Game Link
~98% – tactical attack with no inaccuracies
🧠 What ChatGPT Found
Players maintained high clock time while playing extremely precise moves, even during tactical and endgame complexity.
Multiple games contained sequences that align closely with engine evaluations.
No hesitation or errors were observed, even when several quiet or tricky defensive lines were possible.
Some tactics (. Be6 + Rxg7+ + g4#) were executed instantly — impossible to calculate perfectly in <2 seconds at 1600 level.
📊 Probability summary:
The statistical probability of encountering 4 engine-level performances out of 10 games, all resulting in losses, was estimated by ChatGPT to be:
\boxed{< %}
]
❓ Why I’m Posting This
I’m not here to accuse specific individuals of cheating with certainty.
Rather, I’m sharing this analysis to get feedback and see if others have experienced similar statistical anomalies, even outside peak hours.
The games are public. I’ve done my due diligence using AI assistance.
If you’re curious about anti-cheat vulnerabilities or want to see detailed breakdowns, feel free to ask — I can share the full ChatGPT reports per game.
🔗 Questions for the community:
Have you experienced sudden spikes of suspicious losses in Blitz, even during "safe" periods?
Do you trust Chess.com’s current detection methods in 3+0 time control?
Would you also consider using AI (like ChatGPT) to support your own cheat detection investigations?
Let me know what you think.
Thanks for reading. 👇