Interesting (annotated) game.

After joining this site and reading the sticky threat I've changed my method.. let me know how I did :).

 -Matt

It's much more instructive to analyse by yourself and with other players before asking the computer.

This way, if you make any tactical mistake, you're bound to remember them when the computer points them, because of your earlier implication.

Besides, it's also a good way to assess your ideas. 

As for the game :

- 2...f5! good idea, your opponent must have felt the danger at this point

- your reaction to his c6 move looks very good. 

All in all, a good game, though I'm not sure about your e5 sacrifice, although it worked remarkably well. 

Personally I am suprised that White resigned so eagerly...

If i were white i would:

35. Rxe1 ...  Kxf7
36. Kg2 ...

That put white on the defencive, but not exactly hopeless. (Unless anyone else wants to explain to me my error)

Other than that. Seemed like a good game to me. Congrats. 

15. ... Reb8! would have been good looking back... I think I like my approach at least as well though.

and about the resignation thing.. I think it was probably warranted.. that game was over.. 

DutchDefense missed a draw.

Lol unique your analysis is hilarious :P

 one thing though.. don't bash all of white's moves.. half of them were book and the other half were perfectly playable..

 I'm also pretty convinced that pawn sac was sound...

Thanks for posting though, I will take a closer look at your analysis before bashing it further :P 

TonightOnly...

 BRILLIANT! draw... amazing... very nice, thanks for pointing it out!