Interesting Opening
I don't usually go into that opening as White but I'm pretty sure Nc3 was a mistake. It seems better to play Bxd5 and then followed by Nc3 winning a tempo on the Queen, besides just losing a pawn. After Queen moves perhaps castle or d3.
Then 7. d3 not only undoubles your pawns but gives him a backwards e-pawn.
4...Nxe4! 5. Bxf7+!! seems the best if you see the pawn-fork coming. 5...Kxf7 6. Nxe4, with massive attack on the Black king approaching.
7. Qe2, btw, forking e5-pawn and c4-pawn - I don't think he can defend both.
You play horrifically-bad chess sylverstermmmb (no offence).
4...Nxe4! 5. Bxf7+!! seems the best if you see the pawn-fork coming. 5...Kxf7 6. Nxe4, with massive attack on the Black king approaching.
7. Qe2, btw, forking e5-pawn and c4-pawn - I don't think he can defend both.
You play horrifically-bad chess sylverstermmmb (no offence).
B1, sylverstermmmb was Black. And he rather did a good job. Aka00devon was the one having some problems. You will see in the link below to the game.
http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=47479278
4...Nxe4! 5. Bxf7+!! seems the best if you see the pawn-fork coming. 5...Kxf7 6. Nxe4, with massive attack on the Black king approaching.
7. Qe2, btw, forking e5-pawn and c4-pawn - I don't think he can defend both.
You play horrifically-bad chess sylverstermmmb (no offence).
B1, sylverstermmmb was Black. And he rather did a good job. Aka00devon was the one having some problems. You will see in the link below to the game.
My mistake (board orientation and questions on White moves threw me).
Black's opening, with 4...Nxe4, is still unsound as far as I can see, for the reasons I gave above.
Thanks for the analysis, JJbooy, I appreciate it. In move six in your blue variation (following 5. d4 Nxc3 6. bxc3), I might have gone with the more conservative 6... f6. Is that a mistake? It gives his knight a temporary post on the g5 square, which could pose a problem for me:
This might be the version that is actually "horrifically bad" but I am learning.
Thanks for the analysis, JJbooy, I appreciate it. In move six in your blue variation (following 5. d4 Nxc3 6. bxc3), I might have gone with the more conservative 6... f6. Is that a mistake? It gives his knight a temporary post on the g5 square, which could pose a problem for me:
This might be the version that is actually "horrifically bad" but I am learning.
The problem with 6...f6 is 7.Nh4. I will show you. Others will be able to do a better job, but here is what I have done to others as white, when they play f6.
If you really wanted to protect the e5 pawn I would say for you to play d6.
B1, I found a grandmaster game with the same opening sequence of moves which black won, so I'm not sure I agree with your assessment that 4. ...Nxe4 is unsound. Sorry for the link to the external site:
My mistake...again! The 5. Bxf7+ 'massive attack' on the king does not appear to be as massive as I first thought according to fritz. Black gets compensation for his exposed king from the two central pawns. Still a feasable line, and a hairy ride if taken.
Not surprisingly the master game you found took the best line (fritz) with 6.Bd3, preserving his bishops and regaining material. The resulting position, however, I think is good for black (central pawn) - if he hasn't got and advantage he's at least equal.
Your opponent definitely played horrifically bad though, surely...