Is it possible to get 100% accuracy in a game?

Sort:
MARattigan

Chess bot wot?

Crossiantismid

Use a chess bit every move My friend got banned cuz of that but he got 100%

MARattigan

No, he probably got a 100 CAPS2 score. See posts past.

seanenid

I got 100% accuracy

MARattigan

And probably so did you.

Elroch

Surely in this forum "accuracy" refers to the accuracy stat reported by the game review tool, which was originally CAPS1 and now CAPS2?

MARattigan

Not according to the title, but at any rate it's documented that CAPS2 is not a percentage of anything.

The sister site prints accuracy as a percentage, but of what is a bit unfathomable. I play my grandson (learning) in games and set up basic endings there sometimes. I notice it gives him 99% for mating with rook and king v king in 33 moves and in the last game where I missed a mate in 1 it gives me 98%.

xor_eax_eax05

Yes, you need your opponent to blunder mate in 1 while still on book moves:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/123275101846?tab=review

AGC-Gambit_YT

imagine playing scholars

xor_eax_eax05

That's not scholars. That's the classical variation in the Scotch Game.

It's just my opponent blundered mate in 1, so it looks like it's scholars.

AGC-Gambit_YT

I looked at the game

AGC-Gambit_YT

U didn't play scholar's, but u did the sequence, that's enough for it be scholars in my opinion.

magipi
ChessAGC_YT wrote:

U didn't play scholar's, but u did the sequence, that's enough for it be scholars

No it's not. It's a different opening. You can't give things the name of other things just because they somewhat resemble each other.

AGC-Gambit_YT
magipi wrote:
ChessAGC_YT wrote:

U didn't play scholar's, but u did the sequence, that's enough for it be scholars

No it's not. It's a different opening. You can't give things the name of other things just because they somewhat resemble each other.

I meant that in my opinion it's enough to be scholar's mb I forgot to state that.

SASIK_INDIA_JAIHIND

NO

Abhinav-766

Oh ok

AGC-Gambit_YT
SASIK_INDIA_JAIHIND wrote:

NO

just because you like scholar's is no reason to down vote me, get a life

xor_eax_eax05

You are looking like a fool. We have already explained to you this is not Scholar's, it's a variation in the Scotch.

Yes you said "in your opinion" but that does not make you look less of a fool. If I called chess, checkers, "in my opinion", people would still think it's stupid.

Crossiantismid

Clear Answer, NO

magipi
Crossiantismid wrote:

Clear Answer, NO

There are a hundred examples in this topic.

"Clear answer". Facepalm.