Forums

Is this a good game for a 300?

Kayden_Potter

jaro488

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

TheRevenant66

@Kayden_Potter yeah very well played (:

you kinda blundered the rook but ig it helped later

jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

JCH2021

u played a decent game for a 300 although you did hang a rook and a knight

jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

yes but not necessarily just them

TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

yes but not necessarily just them

so is it possible for a 1000 to have a 'good quality game'?

jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

yes but not necessarily just them

so is it possible for a 1000 to have a 'good quality game'?

u know there's a thing called jokes and sarcasm I'm not sure you've been introduced to those concepts yet

TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

yes but not necessarily just them

so is it possible for a 1000 to have a 'good quality game'?

u know there's a thing called jokes and sarcasm I'm not sure you've been introduced to those concepts yet

yes we have met lol

petrk2

how can one blunder his queen in move 2?? grin.png

AunTheKnight

I tuned out at move 2.

Aiden-1089

I think that in general that's quite a bad game, but a nice job if you're 300.

phuan2012
Aiden-1089 đã viết:

I think that in general that's quite a bad game, but a nice job if you're 300.

yup 

ADAM_PEATY

Pretty good game ngl