Is this a good game for a 300?

Sort:
Avatar of KaydenDaGoalie

Avatar of jaro488

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

Avatar of TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

Avatar of TheRevenant66

@Kayden_Potter yeah very well played (:

you kinda blundered the rook but ig it helped later

Avatar of jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

Avatar of TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

Avatar of JCH2021

u played a decent game for a 300 although you did hang a rook and a knight

Avatar of jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

Avatar of TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

Avatar of jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

Avatar of TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

Avatar of jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

yes but not necessarily just them

Avatar of TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

yes but not necessarily just them

so is it possible for a 1000 to have a 'good quality game'?

Avatar of jaro488
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

yes but not necessarily just them

so is it possible for a 1000 to have a 'good quality game'?

u know there's a thing called jokes and sarcasm I'm not sure you've been introduced to those concepts yet

Avatar of TheRevenant66
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:
TheRevenant66 wrote:
jaro488 wrote:

i dont think theres such thing as a good quality 300 game

so only Magnus Carlsen can have a high quality game?

that is just completely not what i said

everyone has more to learn

and?

what is your definition of a 'good quality game'

high accuracy, no if not very little blunders, solid openings and moves

basically what a grandmaster would do

yes but not necessarily just them

so is it possible for a 1000 to have a 'good quality game'?

u know there's a thing called jokes and sarcasm I'm not sure you've been introduced to those concepts yet

yes we have met lol

Avatar of petrk2

how can one blunder his queen in move 2?? grin.png

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123

I tuned out at move 2.

Avatar of Aiden-1089

I think that in general that's quite a bad game, but a nice job if you're 300.

Avatar of david211269
Aiden-1089 đã viết:

I think that in general that's quite a bad game, but a nice job if you're 300.

yup 

Avatar of ADAM_PEATY

Pretty good game ngl