Is this game a meme ? - Chess Forums - Page 3

adityasaxena4

Aug 23, 2021

0

#41

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

and this all came out of the 3.d5!!! gambit I play all the time against the Italian

I don't understand what you get out of posting such horribly played games. 3. ...d5 is not a gambit, it is a blunder.

The fact you were so completely lost out of the opening shows that it is complete rubbish!

Also , how about you actually try playing 3.d5!!! since it is so "losing" according to you when you have barely any idea the extent of the preparation I have with 3.d5!!! and no it is not just a "pawn blunder" it is a calculated pawn giveaway which means it is a "gambit" !

I have seen your "preparation". Utter trash, refuted by an IM.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/italian-help

Then you'll be even more shocked to find out the win rate I have with this and the wins meaning people that have fallen for these traps exactly how common they are !

adityasaxena4

Aug 23, 2021

0

#42

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

and this all came out of the 3.d5!!! gambit I play all the time against the Italian

I don't understand what you get out of posting such horribly played games. 3. ...d5 is not a gambit, it is a blunder.

The fact you were so completely lost out of the opening shows that it is complete rubbish!

Also , how about you actually try playing 3.d5!!! since it is so "losing" according to you when you have barely any idea the extent of the preparation I have with 3.d5!!! and no it is not just a "pawn blunder" it is a calculated pawn giveaway which means it is a "gambit" !

I have seen your "preparation". Utter trash, refuted by an IM.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/italian-help

Then you'll be even more shocked to find out the win rate I have with this and the wins meaning people that have fallen for these traps exactly how common they are !

The only reason you would have any decent win rate with that is that your rating is 1300. Games between players at that level are decided by tactics and blunders.

If you played that at higher levels, you would lose the vast majority of the time.

you say that but I trapped a 1900's Queen in 18 moves and that was a higher level game !

adityasaxena4

Aug 23, 2021

0

#43

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

and this all came out of the 3.d5!!! gambit I play all the time against the Italian

I don't understand what you get out of posting such horribly played games. 3. ...d5 is not a gambit, it is a blunder.

The fact you were so completely lost out of the opening shows that it is complete rubbish!

Also , how about you actually try playing 3.d5!!! since it is so "losing" according to you when you have barely any idea the extent of the preparation I have with 3.d5!!! and no it is not just a "pawn blunder" it is a calculated pawn giveaway which means it is a "gambit" !

I have seen your "preparation". Utter trash, refuted by an IM.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/italian-help

Then you'll be even more shocked to find out the win rate I have with this and the wins meaning people that have fallen for these traps exactly how common they are !

The only reason you would have any decent win rate with that is that your rating is 1300. Games between players at that level are decided by tactics and blunders.

If you played that at higher levels, you would lose the vast majority of the time.

you say that but I trapped a 1900's Queen in 18 moves and that was a higher level game !

that too daily!

adityasaxena4

Aug 23, 2021

0

#44

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

and this all came out of the 3.d5!!! gambit I play all the time against the Italian

I don't understand what you get out of posting such horribly played games. 3. ...d5 is not a gambit, it is a blunder.

The fact you were so completely lost out of the opening shows that it is complete rubbish!

Also , how about you actually try playing 3.d5!!! since it is so "losing" according to you when you have barely any idea the extent of the preparation I have with 3.d5!!! and no it is not just a "pawn blunder" it is a calculated pawn giveaway which means it is a "gambit" !

I have seen your "preparation". Utter trash, refuted by an IM.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/italian-help

Then you'll be even more shocked to find out the win rate I have with this and the wins meaning people that have fallen for these traps exactly how common they are !

The only reason you would have any decent win rate with that is that your rating is 1300. Games between players at that level are decided by tactics and blunders.

If you played that at higher levels, you would lose the vast majority of the time.

you say that but I trapped a 1900's Queen in 18 moves and that was a higher level game !

Too be exact he was rated 1887 around

adityasaxena4

Aug 23, 2021

0

#45

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

TooManyBlunders wrote:

adityasaxena4 wrote:

and this all came out of the 3.d5!!! gambit I play all the time against the Italian

I don't understand what you get out of posting such horribly played games. 3. ...d5 is not a gambit, it is a blunder.

The fact you were so completely lost out of the opening shows that it is complete rubbish!

Also , how about you actually try playing 3.d5!!! since it is so "losing" according to you when you have barely any idea the extent of the preparation I have with 3.d5!!! and no it is not just a "pawn blunder" it is a calculated pawn giveaway which means it is a "gambit" !

I have seen your "preparation". Utter trash, refuted by an IM.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/italian-help

Then you'll be even more shocked to find out the win rate I have with this and the wins meaning people that have fallen for these traps exactly how common they are !

The only reason you would have any decent win rate with that is that your rating is 1300. Games between players at that level are decided by tactics and blunders.

If you played that at higher levels, you would lose the vast majority of the time.

you say that but I trapped a 1900's Queen in 18 moves and that was a higher level game !

You won because of a one move blunder by the 1900. You did not outplay the 1900, in fact they were winning up until that stage. Your opponent maintained the advantage that you gifted them on move 3.

You will never improve hoping for blunders from your opponent.

how did I not outplay the 1900?

CastawayWill

Aug 23, 2021

0

#46

Beautiful game

adityasaxena4

Aug 23, 2021

0

#47

CastawayWill wrote:

Beautiful game

I agree!

adityasaxena4

Aug 24, 2021

0

#48

After my opponent basically fell for one of the most basic tactical traps in the 3.d5!!! gambit against the Italian the one where the rook is basically won back as material compensation after as you'll see Qh4+ Kf1 Bg4 Qe1 Qxe1+ Kxe1 Nxc2+ then Nxa1 and all the while making white's king forfeit castling then afterwards the conversion process was very simple and straightforward until white declined the trade of rooks I found the brilliant g5 to take advantage of the king's new positioning and then I setup a mating net and won the game as you can see!

adityasaxena4

Aug 26, 2021

0

#49

I won white's rook for a strong passed e-pawn I acquired on move 16/20 and then I effortlessly acquired a kingside majority and then there was a pawn race that I won and made a queen and then proceeded to just squeeze white's king towards the corner and create zugzwang and then I mated in the one of the most meme like ways possible!

Snowflufffy

Aug 27, 2021

0

#50

“Nobody ever won a chess game by resigning.”

adityasaxena4

Aug 27, 2021

0

#51

This is what I happened when I went for an Italian then a Four Knights then the reverse of 3.d5!!! gambit as white where I ended up trapping the rook and then easily winning the game in the end I even trapped blacks bishop as he blundered !

adityasaxena4

Aug 27, 2021

0

#52

I was rated 1306 he was rated 1225!

adityasaxena4

Aug 28, 2021

0

#53

This game started with a Vampire Opening and then continued to become an attack down the middle in which he had to give the knight otherwise Nc7+ winning rook then I sacrificed the knight back for checkmate threats and then I sacrificed the queen to get a 3 rook triple checkmate in the middle of the board !

adityasaxena4

Aug 28, 2021

0

#54

After my opponent just fell for the most simpleton and beginner trap after the 3.d5!!! gambit against the Italian I proceeded to win his rook on the queenside with a knight fork and then he blundered an easy to spot checkmate and that's how I won this game !

adityasaxena4

Aug 28, 2021

0

#55

LOL ... he's probably rated 100!

adityasaxena4

Sep 2, 2021

0

#56

Lol... This started with an Indian Game : Accelerated where I basically pushed a lot of pawns forward especially Harry the h-pawn who landed on h6 on move 10 which started the process of me positionally binding all my opponents pieces although I was expecting a slow and suffocating game where I suffocate my opponent my opponent sacrificed material to try to break out but I still got every piece activated and involved in hunting my opponents king down which led to the kill shot Nxe5 which sealed the deal . Also you know the saying "If you leave two GM's alone they'll play h4 h5"-IM Levy Rozman / Gothamchess

adityasaxena4

Sep 2, 2021

0

#57

I was totally throttling my opponent AlphaZero style !

adityasaxena4

Sep 2, 2021

0

#58

If Ke8 Qe7# if Kf8 Qh8#

adityasaxena4

Sep 2, 2021

0

#59

Lol... he basically got Criss-Cross-Apple-Sauced!

WallnutAtGarden

Sep 2, 2021

0

#60

funny