Wiesbaden_HS_GER wrote:
andy haha this punk ill fly at him left and right and the leave him high and dry with this belt wringed around his neck.. and that is a fact.
Reminds me of a lyrick. Punks jump up to get beat down. lol.
Just got completely blown off the board by someone 400 points higher than me
Sort:
AndyClifton wrote:
makikihustle wrote:
And my skill level will continue to rise with more experience and study--which are, in my firm opinion, the only two ingredients required to get better.
If you were a GM, that opinion would be a whole lot firmer.
Why would it be a lot more firmer? The truth of a statement has no relation to who is stating the truth.
Ok on that note i an checking out this Hotel to a new thread before it develops into somethng else.
Ok Ok i Owned this game and about to own barney andy
Apr 2, 2013
0
#87
You went on the offense before castling (completeing development). This rarely ends well against a skilled opponent --- you can only do that when you are actually winning, and if you are winning by that much, you outclass your opponent too much. I see this constantly in the 1300-1500 rating play, players whip out 2-3 pieces and go running around the board looking to win the game in 10 moves, and end up wondering how they lost.
Wiesbaden_HS_GER wrote:
Ok Ok i Owned this game and about to own barney andy
You're all talk and no beak, chickenhawk!
Yereslov wrote:
The truth of a statement has no relation to who is stating the truth.
Yeah, I guess you're right. That's why I've decided to stop paying doctors their exorbitant fees and just ask some wino what's wrong with me the next time I'm ailing.
AndyClifton wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
The truth of a statement has no relation to who is stating the truth.
Yeah, I guess you're right. That's why I've decided to stop paying doctors their exorbitant fees and just ask some wino what's wrong with me the next time I'm ailing.
Well, then that's a gamble. I'm sure you are familiar with the Correspondence Theory of Truth.
"Narrowly speaking, the correspondence theory of truth is the view that truth is correspondence to a fact—a view that was advocated by Russell and Moore early in the 20th century. But the label is usually applied much more broadly to any view explicitly embracing the idea that truth consists in a relation to reality, i.e., that truth is a relational property involving a characteristic relation (to be specified) to some portion of reality (to be specified). "
In reality, a doctor has about as much credibility as anyone else.
AndyClifton wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
The truth of a statement has no relation to who is stating the truth.
Yeah, I guess you're right. That's why I've decided to stop paying doctors their exorbitant fees and just ask some wino what's wrong with me the next time I'm ailing.
I'm here to help, Mr. Clifton.
The statement "you are sick", if it corresponds to reality, will always be true regardless of whether it's an idiot or a doctor.
Correspondence theory of truth, eh? Tell us more, Dr. Yeres!
AlCzervik wrote:
Correspondence theory of truth, eh? Tell us more, Dr. Yeres!
I'm not a doctor. This is just general knowledge.
Yet another of Yereslov's clouds of inspiration:
chessteenager wrote:
Was it the right time to attack or was i just being a noob
It is always the right time to attack!
AndyClifton wrote:
Yet another of Yereslov's clouds of inspiration:
You obviously did not read the quoted text.
No, that would have made things even worse.
AndyClifton wrote:
No, that would have made things even worse.
Yes, I can see how reading can be difficult for you...
Wiesbaden hauls in his catch: