Sure, just some general advice about attacking and pawn structure.
Kasparov said in an interview that he had a habit as a kid of dividing the board in two, and counting non-pawns to see if he had more pieces on the kingside than his opponent because that can indicate attacking possibilities.
And then also tip #10 here
https://www.chess.com/article/view/the-principles-of-the-opening
As for a name, it looks like a position that came from the king's indian attack opening.
And as for textbook vs advanced, I guess that depends on your experience and level. To me it looks like white followed a textbook approach (whether accidentally or on purpose) but some idea (like in the link I posted for you) may be new or advanced ways of thinking for you.
Hi
I'm very new to online chess and playing my first tournament just to improve and one game I'm highly outranked and I'm very impress by my opponent's way of playing. Very laid back, spent a lot of time developing pushing forward then moving backward and then ends up with what I call this fortress around the king making it very difficult to attack.
I know I'm about to get squashed as I know enough to see what's coming but not what to do about it :-) (He's white obviously). We're dead equal on pieces but structurally I've already lost i know that.
Anyway my question is this a "text book" approach to more advance chess, a coded opening?
[This game is still on so don't tell me what or how to play this, just where this is coming from for future reference] Yes i asked him but he's been unresponsive
Not asking for advice but reference