The line played (2...d5 3.exd5 exf4) is a great, uncomplicated practical choice, and I have also scored well with 2...d5 3.exd5 c6.
I do not gibvve a damn if the engine says "equal"- I get a rational position where it's easy to play actively as Black.
What do you think about playing 2...d5 3.exd5 e4, pushing forward instead of taking the f4 pawn? I have faced it a couple of times as white, but i never faced someone taking my f4 pawn as part of falkbeer gambit.
This is the old way to handle the position. It may work fine against a weak player (pretty much like any dubious line), but objectively speaking, Black has problems after 4.d3.
Still, you can find a few games between very strong players featuring 3...e4, but all of them are short games (rapid & blitz).
The line played (2...d5 3.exd5 exf4) is a great, uncomplicated practical choice, and I have also scored well with 2...d5 3.exd5 c6.
I do not gibvve a damn if the engine says "equal"- I get a rational position where it's easy to play actively as Black.
What do you think about playing 2...d5 3.exd5 e4, pushing forward instead of taking the f4 pawn? I have faced it a couple of times as white, but i never faced someone taking my f4 pawn as part of falkbeer gambit.
I asked the same on comment #17.