Forums

Knight+Bishop = Rook+Pawn?

Sort:
Avatar of Anti_Nihilist
Anti_Nihilist
Jan 7, 2014
0
#1

I know that this question depends of the position of the pieces, but: do you think that it is correct to change a knight and bishop for a rook and pawn?

Thanks.

Avatar of notmtwain
notmtwain
Jan 7, 2014
0
#2

 See http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/trading-bishop-and-knight-for-rook-and-pawn

Avatar of ilikecapablanca
ilikecapablanca
Jan 7, 2014
0
#3

Is this in one of your currant games?

Avatar of Hi832
Hi832
Jan 7, 2014
0
#4

a knight and bishop are better than a rook and pawn

Avatar of Hi832
Hi832
Jan 7, 2014
0
#5
ilikecapablanca wrote:

Is this in one of your currant games?


yes, in his game against tran6vu

Avatar of ilikecapablanca
ilikecapablanca
Jan 7, 2014
0
#6

Ok. You know you're not supposed to ask people for advice, right?

Avatar of Anti_Nihilist
Anti_Nihilist
Jan 7, 2014
0
#7

This is a general questions, not about a specifically game.

P.D.: the game against tran6vu is obviously lost.

Avatar of Hi832
Hi832
Jan 8, 2014
0
#8

oh sorry, i looked wrong, i thought you had another rook