I don't know if this is even still going on. But, if so I would love to have this game analyzed. Personally I am (most) interested in the endgame. Although it was one of my first attempts at trying out the modern thanks to tiger and simon williams.
Also after whites 47th at the end of the line the comp gives isn't that just a draw or am I missing something really simple as usual. I mean the king take e3 and then sacrifices the rook for the last pawn. What am I missing there?
https://www.chess.com/live/game/2955647394
A variant of the Polish opening I came up with, and still looking for weaknesses...
analyze this game https://youtu.be/nD4TYUOPSs4
I just played this game with the Soller Gambit, and it's probably one of my best games. https://www.chess.com/live/game/2978235929
I feel I struggle in middle game a lot. I often seem lost, can't seem to find what to do or how to improve the position. Sometimes all comes naturally and I stroll over the game and wonder how did that happen so easily. Examples:
1. Everything comes together
I didnt feel I had to work too hard in there. Moves came naturally and almost easily.
2. The Not so good way may games often go
In this game I thought I had a nice position after he opened his king but I could get nowhere, he shut down all my attempts and when I run the game through computer I didnt seem to make many mistakes (2 inaccuracies and 2 mistakes) and the lines computer suggested didnt seem any better than what I played (for example move 23 I should've played Qf7 instead of Rd8? or Move 25 instead of recapturing with a pawn Qxb6 was better. After the move 11.... O-O-O I really had no Idea how I could've played better or what else I could've done Through the whole game and it is very frustrating .
When it's time to go to bed....
I have a philosophy that if I am loosing, before resigning I try to complicate the game as much as possible. Here I made an opening blunder in the petrov, and from there everything went wrong until a miracle happened.
D4