That’s hilarious!
More Game Review Nonsense
Sort:
Jan 20, 2024
0
#3
My engine says that the best move is Nc6, followed by Nf3. Those have nothing to do with a bishop. LOL
Jan 20, 2024
0
#4
This game review from chess.com is very superficial. You should ignore it
Jan 21, 2024
0
#6
Adilson0liveira wrote:
This game review from chess.com is very superficial. You should ignore it
"ignore"....well, it's mostly just 'okay', but leaves a lot to be desired and at times down right weird (like in my example).
Aimchess which chess.com acquired with the PMG purchase does better...although it too needs to to be improved quite a lot as well. It was built initially for teachers to use for their students...and really hasn't evolved enough away from that.
The automated analysis in Chessbase is evolving and very good at pointing out things like mentioning a moving leaving you 'weak on the dark squares', etc, flagging specific tactics you missed/found with 3 leves of commentary. This would be great if it could look at a group of your games and pull together from the data that you miss....say useful specific (ex: deflection) sacrifices 33% of the time for example instead of just saying you missed them in the games.
Another is Decode Chess, but is far too expensive for what you get...and a bit clumsy and they really do not seem to be doing anything to improve it.
So, I develop a bishop...and Game Analysis says:
You missed an opportunity to prepare a bishop for development. I guess 'preparing' is better than actually 'doing' LOL!: