My best game EVER!
Sort:
👍
Look at my game [Site "Chess.com iPhone"]
[Date "07/22/2019 07:00pm"]
[White "Tokioranch (811)"]
[Black "zhu6768 (812)"]
1.e4 {4:59} e5 {4:59} 2.d4 {4:57} Qe7 {4:52} 3.Bc4 {4:56} Nf6 {4:49} 4.d5 {4:55} Nxe4 {4:45} 5.Bd3 {4:49} Nd6 {4:38} 6.Nf3 {4:42} e4 {4:35} 7.Bxe4 {4:38} Nxe4 {4:34} 8.Nc3 {4:38} Nxc3+ {4:31} 9.Be3 {3:58} Nxd5 {4:22} 10.Qxd5 {3:45} Qb4+ {4:18} 11.c3 {3:41} Qxb2 {4:15} 12.O-O {3:36} Qxc3 {4:02} 13.Ng5 {3:33} c6 {3:52} 14.Qxf7+ {3:30} Kd8 {3:48} 15.Rfe1 {3:17} Be7 {3:32} 16.Ne4 {3:07} Qe5 {3:22} 17.Ng3 {2:59} Qe6 {3:09} 18.Bc5 {2:45} Qxf7 {3:06} 19.Rxe7 {2:36} Qf6 {2:54} 20.Nh5 {2:22} Qxa1+ {2:52} 21.Re1 {2:16} Qxe1# {2:51} {Black Wins}
[Date "07/22/2019 07:00pm"]
[White "Tokioranch (811)"]
[Black "zhu6768 (812)"]
1.e4 {4:59} e5 {4:59} 2.d4 {4:57} Qe7 {4:52} 3.Bc4 {4:56} Nf6 {4:49} 4.d5 {4:55} Nxe4 {4:45} 5.Bd3 {4:49} Nd6 {4:38} 6.Nf3 {4:42} e4 {4:35} 7.Bxe4 {4:38} Nxe4 {4:34} 8.Nc3 {4:38} Nxc3+ {4:31} 9.Be3 {3:58} Nxd5 {4:22} 10.Qxd5 {3:45} Qb4+ {4:18} 11.c3 {3:41} Qxb2 {4:15} 12.O-O {3:36} Qxc3 {4:02} 13.Ng5 {3:33} c6 {3:52} 14.Qxf7+ {3:30} Kd8 {3:48} 15.Rfe1 {3:17} Be7 {3:32} 16.Ne4 {3:07} Qe5 {3:22} 17.Ng3 {2:59} Qe6 {3:09} 18.Bc5 {2:45} Qxf7 {3:06} 19.Rxe7 {2:36} Qf6 {2:54} 20.Nh5 {2:22} Qxa1+ {2:52} 21.Re1 {2:16} Qxe1# {2:51} {Black Wins}
Sorry didn’t mean to make it like that
ChessBoy513 wrote:
14.Qh5+ followed by mate, 15.Bf7#, 22.Bxd8 and 26.Na7# were chances where white could have won, whereas g1=Q and a1=Q were chances where black could have won. Reep, touchdowns don't give you anything. I wonder how the moves are so bad despite being a daily game and how white didn't get checkmated early. You thought 15.Bf7# was a forfeit, Reep? See https;//www.chess.com/live/game/3866985920 and think again. You nearly lost in the endgame and only drew because your opponent accidentally underpromoted. Points aren't everything and you can't do king sacrifices. I wonder if you were surprised you couldn't do the king sac. You don't need touchdowns to checkmate and Junebug analysis and Junebug was way better. Try to win the exchange and Reep, your first 3 moves would only work if it was King of the Hill. If you like developing kings and random openings, play King of the Hill or Fischerandom(Chess960). Your exclamation points are rather blunders, and YOU were the one who got lucky, not Junebug. Why don't you two play a rematch? It was officially a draw by insufficient checkmating material. That's about it. Both analysis are bad, but Junebug's is better.
I agree with the last 4 words of your statement.
Junebug444님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
14.Qh5+ followed by mate, 15.Bf7#, 22.Bxd8 and 26.Na7# were chances where white could have won, whereas g1=Q and a1=Q were chances where black could have won. Reep, touchdowns don't give you anything. I wonder how the moves are so bad despite being a daily game and how white didn't get checkmated early. You thought 15.Bf7# was a forfeit, Reep? See https;//www.chess.com/live/game/3866985920 and think again. You nearly lost in the endgame and only drew because your opponent accidentally underpromoted. Points aren't everything and you can't do king sacrifices. I wonder if you were surprised you couldn't do the king sac. You don't need touchdowns to checkmate and Junebug analysis and Junebug was way better. Try to win the exchange and Reep, your first 3 moves would only work if it was King of the Hill. If you like developing kings and random openings, play King of the Hill or Fischerandom(Chess960). Your exclamation points are rather blunders, and YOU were the one who got lucky, not Junebug. Why don't you two play a rematch? It was officially a draw by insufficient checkmating material. That's about it. Both analysis are bad, but Junebug's is better.
I agree with the last 4 words of your statement.
Thanks.
ChessBoy513 wrote:
Junebug444님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
14.Qh5+ followed by mate, 15.Bf7#, 22.Bxd8 and 26.Na7# were chances where white could have won, whereas g1=Q and a1=Q were chances where black could have won. Reep, touchdowns don't give you anything. I wonder how the moves are so bad despite being a daily game and how white didn't get checkmated early. You thought 15.Bf7# was a forfeit, Reep? See https;//www.chess.com/live/game/3866985920 and think again. You nearly lost in the endgame and only drew because your opponent accidentally underpromoted. Points aren't everything and you can't do king sacrifices. I wonder if you were surprised you couldn't do the king sac. You don't need touchdowns to checkmate and Junebug analysis and Junebug was way better. Try to win the exchange and Reep, your first 3 moves would only work if it was King of the Hill. If you like developing kings and random openings, play King of the Hill or Fischerandom(Chess960). Your exclamation points are rather blunders, and YOU were the one who got lucky, not Junebug. Why don't you two play a rematch? It was officially a draw by insufficient checkmating material. That's about it. Both analysis are bad, but Junebug's is better.
I agree with the last 4 words of your statement.
Thanks.
No problem <3
Jul 22, 2019
0
#149
Reepicheep14 wrote:
Because my king needed to go score a touchdown.
its like the offensive lineman making it to the endzone xD
Jul 22, 2019
0
#150
ive found a comment trend in this post, anyone rated about 1300 blitz doesnt get it, sorry if you are 1300 in blitz
Lol, your opponent kept pushing his king up on the first few moves 
Honestly, honestly you have outsmarted chess itself. You need to be Breakthrough Prize. (search it up if you dont know what it is) This analysis is truly amazing.
It's a game with two players whom learned the chess just before this game Its not marvelous its funny
hopertime wrote:
Honestly, honestly you have outsmarted chess itself. You need to be Breakthrough Prize. (search it up if you dont know what it is) This analysis is truly amazing.
Thank you very much. I agree.
14.Qh5+ followed by mate, 15.Bf7#, 22.Bxd8 and 26.Na7# were chances where white could have won, whereas g1=Q and a1=Q were chances where black could have won. Reep, touchdowns don't give you anything. I wonder how the moves are so bad despite being a daily game and how white didn't get checkmated early. You thought 15.Bf7# was a forfeit, Reep? See https;//www.chess.com/live/game/3866985920 and think again. You nearly lost in the endgame and only drew because your opponent accidentally underpromoted. Points aren't everything and you can't do king sacrifices. I wonder if you were surprised you couldn't do the king sac. You don't need touchdowns to checkmate and Junebug analysis and Junebug was way better. Try to win the exchange and Reep, your first 3 moves would only work if it was King of the Hill. If you like developing kings and random openings, play King of the Hill or Fischerandom(Chess960). Your exclamation points are rather blunders, and YOU were the one who got lucky, not Junebug. Why don't you two play a rematch? It was officially a draw by insufficient checkmating material. That's about it. Both analysis are bad, but Junebug's is better.