My immortal game

Please enjoy this game where I strategically crush a 600 opponent. It was really enjoyable.

nice game

It's interesting how a patzer claim a game full of blunders his "immortal"

And 2...Nc6!! why two "!!"????? lol it's a normal develompent move

10...Nxg4?? is a terrible blunder, if he plays the normal 11.Bxd2! then he would win a piece

And I don't write others several blunders

Mortal.

This is the most shameful immortal among all shameful immortals

Good game however 16. Kf2 ...Qh4+?! better is Qf5 pinning the pawn further, then followed by safety of your king and crushing him with a f-pawn push seems a bit stronger... also 17. Ke2 Bxf3+is not a very useful move as it allows him to develop his Knight, attack your Queen so you loose tempo and clear way for Kings flight to Queenside. Better would have been 17 ... Bd3 then O-O and then an eventual f5 pawn push.

1. His f6 pawn is an asset as it blocks his Queen and Knight, don't remove it until you can garner a decisive arsenal, meaning your rooks otherwise the guy can wiggle himself out neutralize your passed pawn and make it messy.

2. You want your Queen to control the h3-c1 diagonal she is best placed in f5 for the reasons above.

3. Don't be above trading Queens, you have a Queening pawn and he has homeless King.

4. Your Bishop "sac" is easily refutable and it allows him/her to develop his knight and if he survives your attack forcing a queen exchange and take your passed pawn and eventually take his Bishop to pawn advantage home.

Bring a game where you beat at least a 1750 player (I am assuming you are 1550 to 1650) that would require stronger moves. However good job.

Even after all the blundersfest, 25.Kd2 is still winning without much trouble.

It's hard to applaude.

I thot it was pretty good tho, so...

Stop trolling. If I read immortal game, I want to see a immortal game. 

SOmething like this: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1018910

MY immortal game, post your bumpf on some other thread.

As usual, your game falls under the category or topic of discussion of this thread.

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/players-undermining-the-aesthetics-and-brilliance-of-an-quotimmortalquot?

THIS GAME IS NOT OF GOOD QUALITY, in fact it looks similiar to what I would find in my garbage can!

I didn't see it mentioned, but What about 8... h4?  Isn't that pawn just hanging?  h4 is defended by the 2 minor pieces and a pawn where as all black has is a rook.

People, everyone above 1200 thinks this game is horrible, but the guy is just 776!  We all start some where, and I think we all need to be proud of our progress if we wish to continue to do so.

CC, the guy does not know what an immortal is if he considers this one to be one.

Read the thread, and read some of the comments. This game applies to that, no excuses about ratings. Immortal games must be of high quality, played on a high level really.

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/players-undermining-the-aesthetics-and-brilliance-of-an-quotimmortalquot?lc=1#last_comment

Did anyone point out 15...Bxf3+ yet? (a) 16. Kf2 Qe3+ 17. Kg3 Bxe1+ (b) 16. kh2 Qf4+ 17. Kg1 Qg3+ 

Well, if he thinks he should have a better rating, he must act as if he deserved it. This does NOT include posting such a game.

You call a real immortal game bumpf? 

I suggest you study the meaning of immortal and stop making useless sacrifices in your games. 

this game is of terrible quality to be considerd an immortal. I dont care about the OPs feelings, its bad and he posted it, so he deserves what he deserves from his viewers/commenters.

perfect_idiot you have 1500 in online chess and 750 in live chess. how?

I'll agree that the title is wrong.  It's not Byrne - Fischer.  At least the guy is getting some good analysis from everyone!