No mistake, neither questionnable for a player rated in 1000. - Chess Forums - Page 2

ninjaswat

Sep 20, 2021

0

#21

GM_Rajat_Shenoi wrote:

gilligan841 wrote:

GM_Rajat_Shenoi wrote:

Yeah but we gotta report it right? Only then will some action be taken? Only then we can find out wether he is guilty or not.

That's what I did and I received a message from chess.com as they took an action against my opponent that remains confidential.

I sent a message to my opponent at first telling him that the software didn't report any inaccurency in his game and that it was the first time against all my opponents. He didn't respond; he might have should.

I donno...

Yeah that is correct. If I feel a doubt, I take it my responsibility to report a player. Then it is chess.com's decision. I also received the same response. I checked my game archive and found out that the person i reported was banned. That proves that he had done some wrong. Also, I don't send a personal message to them, because they could start taking counter measures. Well I would say

REPORT A GAME IF YOU SUS THEM EVEN A BIT AND TRUST THAT CHESS.COM WON'T BAN THEN UNNECESSARILY AND THAT THEY WILL TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES. IF IT WAS ME IN THE GAME MENTIOED IN THE FORUM, I WOULD HAVE REPORTED IT.

How is chess.com supposed to sort out all of your reports?? They already do millions...

GM_Rajat_Shenoi

Sep 20, 2021

0

#22

ninjaswat wrote:

GM_Rajat_Shenoi wrote:

gilligan841 wrote:

GM_Rajat_Shenoi wrote:

Yeah but we gotta report it right? Only then will some action be taken? Only then we can find out wether he is guilty or not.

That's what I did and I received a message from chess.com as they took an action against my opponent that remains confidential.

I sent a message to my opponent at first telling him that the software didn't report any inaccurency in his game and that it was the first time against all my opponents. He didn't respond; he might have should.

I donno...

Yeah that is correct. If I feel a doubt, I take it my responsibility to report a player. Then it is chess.com's decision. I also received the same response. I checked my game archive and found out that the person i reported was banned. That proves that he had done some wrong. Also, I don't send a personal message to them, because they could start taking counter measures. Well I would say

REPORT A GAME IF YOU SUS THEM EVEN A BIT AND TRUST THAT CHESS.COM WON'T BAN THEN UNNECESSARILY AND THAT THEY WILL TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES. IF IT WAS ME IN THE GAME MENTIOED IN THE FORUM, I WOULD HAVE REPORTED IT.

How is chess.com supposed to sort out all of your reports?? They already do millions...

We are not reporting unecessarily right? I am not telling you to report each and every game. I am telling you to report if you suspect them. Also, chess.com has enough strength to handle those, and once they do, the reports will automatically reduce as the number of cheaters reduce!

Aiyugidik

Sep 20, 2021

0

#23

In some of my games, I get 90%+ accuracy. I think you should accept the loss, some players are like me and have bipolar chess skills, players like us will play with next to or no mistakes one game and then fifteen blunders the game after. I think I have been reported several times because I win with scholars mate or do a good checkmate, I say, "I think" because they'll message me after saying stuff like, "I'M REPORTING YOU, YOU FILTHY CHEATING CHEATER", may have been paraphrased to avoid cursing several times and to avoid saying a specific racial slur, and I was the one that got banned for playing a good game, though this was on a different chess site. And to address the issue of the players rank, they could like me, of played chess a lot before coming onto this site like, for example, in real life or on a different chess site.

GM_Rajat_Shenoi

Sep 20, 2021

0

#24

@Aiyugidik, I agree there are people like you and I believe chess.com has appropriate measures to not BAN people who don't deserve them. Don't worry, you should continue the good work!