Promoting queen is wrong?
Sort:
CrlsonMagnus
May 5, 2023
0
#1
May 5, 2023
0
#2
CrlsonMagnus wrote:
Shows promotion to queen is best when I look at it.
May 5, 2023
0
#3
Martin_Stahl wrote:
CrlsonMagnus wrote:
Shows promotion to queen is best when I look at it.
So is it an error on my end for stockfish?
May 5, 2023
0
#4
Could be related to the depth it ran at, though it seems unlikely based on the material. The reviews are ran server side and that process returns the classification levels
May 5, 2023
0
#5
Elite-Strategist wrote:
CrlsonMagnus написал:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
CrlsonMagnus wrote:
Shows promotion to queen is best when I look at it.
So is it an error on my end for stockfish?
Don't always trust the Engines; they're not always correct; the main reason(s) why Queen-Promotion is an error/inaccuracy/blunder is normally for situations where Queen-Promotion would result in a stale-mate so for all we know Chat-GPT may have been scrambling with Stock-Fish's perception of board-material & formation.
oh I see
Usually Stockfish does this when the promoted piece will get captured immediately and it doesn't matter as much what you promote to. This example completely defies all expectations.
Elite-Strategist wrote:
CrlsonMagnus написал:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
CrlsonMagnus wrote:
Shows promotion to queen is best when I look at it.
So is it an error on my end for stockfish?
Don't always trust the Engines; they're not always correct; the main reason(s) why Queen-Promotion is an error/inaccuracy/blunder is normally for situations where Queen-Promotion would result in a stale-mate so for all we know Chat-GPT may have been scrambling with Stock-Fish's perception of board-material & formation.
What is the point of writing complete nonsense like this?
no confies en las locomotoras
Well, there is nothing wrong with it.
magipi wrote:
Elite-Strategist wrote:
CrlsonMagnus написал:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
CrlsonMagnus wrote:
Shows promotion to queen is best when I look at it.
So is it an error on my end for stockfish?
Don't always trust the Engines; they're not always correct; the main reason(s) why Queen-Promotion is an error/inaccuracy/blunder is normally for situations where Queen-Promotion would result in a stale-mate so for all we know Chat-GPT may have been scrambling with Stock-Fish's perception of board-material & formation.
What is the point of writing complete nonsense like this?
There isn't any. Perhaps consider the sourse.
Elite-Strategist wrote:
magipi написал:
Elite-Strategist wrote:
CrlsonMagnus написал:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
CrlsonMagnus wrote:
Shows promotion to queen is best when I look at it.
So is it an error on my end for stockfish?
Don't always trust the Engines; they're not always correct; the main reason(s) why Queen-Promotion is an error/inaccuracy/blunder is normally for situations where Queen-Promotion would result in a stale-mate so for all we know Chat-GPT may have been scrambling with Stock-Fish's perception of board-material & formation.
What is the point of writing complete nonsense like this?
What is the point of flaunting your complete ignorance like that...?
Stop when you're behind. You've already embarrased yourself. Don't compound it.
May 7, 2023
0
#13
someone: chatgpt messed up stockfish so it thinks black will stalemate
literally all sane people: what does that even mean!?
ok, sorry to burst your bubble, chatgpt cant possibly mess up stockfish
and besides, that is not even close to stalemate, which is more like this
Ilampozhil25 wrote:
someone: chatgpt messed up stockfish so it thinks black will stalemate
literally all sane people: what does that even mean!?
I guess that is some dumb meme originating from the Levy Rozman video that the guy posted above. I don't wanna watch it.
May 7, 2023
0
#15
nope
nothing of that sort in mentioned in the video
its actually pretty good and EXTREMELY funny
chat gpt did nothing to stockfish... except spawn in pieces, capture its own pieces, and other hilarious stuff