Qf3#?? Checkmate as a blunder?
Sort:
TheRealGorf
Sep 27, 2020
0
#1
Shame I cant post a printscreen. The analysis has just given a checkmate move as a blunder. Hillarious.... anyone else had that???
I've had that too! Here it is:
Sep 27, 2020
0
#3
The computer feels that you should have slowly tortured your opponent for another 30 moves instead of ending the agony with a quick checkmate.
Computers are vicious.
blueemu wrote:
The computer feels that you should have slowly tortured your opponent for another 30 moves instead of ending the agony with a quick checkmate.
Computers are vicious.
yes
blueemu wrote:
The computer feels that you should have slowly tortured your opponent for another 30 moves instead of ending the agony with a quick checkmate.
Computers are vicious.
lol
Sep 27, 2020
0
#7
What's so unusual about this? Checkmating the opponent probably loses the game and the computer probably seems a better move.
2Ke21-0 wrote:
What's so unusual about this? Checkmating the opponent probably loses the game and the computer probably seems a better move.
+1
Maybe, just maybe, in a bughouse tournament where for some reason the overall scoring system means you would rather your partner got the win instead of you, so you want to hand him/her pieces instead of finishing it off on your board. I think the moral there is not to invent weird scoring systems in a bughouse tournament.
Sep 27, 2020
0
#11
Does the mate in 6 mean anything? Is this some sort of variant that requires mate in 6? It does seem strange. 
Qf4# Is a terrible blunder! You had a tactic, Qd3+ winning the knight!! Now thats a brilliance!
Obviously Nc6# is better as you develop a piece as well!
If there is another chechkmate move (and in this case there is) computer sees it otherwise and thats why
MISTER_McCHESS wrote:
Well, The goal of chess is to make your opponent checkmate you, so you just gave him the win *
*in case you're an idiot and don't understand, this is something called sarcasm
How to write small??