Seeking strong players to give feedback on serious analysis

I'm following an advice from Yasser Seirawan: Presenting serious analysis to stronger players. Hope you can give me some feedback, thanks a lot.

I used a computer for the analysis:

http://www.chess.com/blog/ala_/analysing-my-losses-feedback-wanted

I am not stronger than you, but I did check chess365's opening explorer and found that your approach, which you questioned, is far from a novelty and has been tried by masters and senior masters.  http://www.365chess.com/opening.php?m=14&n=250480&ms=e4.d6.d4.Nf6.Nc3.g6.Be3.c6.a4.Bg7.h3.O-O.g4&ns=3.51.29.52.70.75.900.1516.6682.6124.5360.6125.250480

Came as a surprise to me since your approach looked quite odd to me, and I questioned whether it was just a position that computers dont evaluate well.  

Thanks.

 >Came as a surprise to me since your approach looked quite odd to me, and I questioned whether it was just a position that computers dont evaluate well. 

I think in the computer analysis there was nothing wrong with the move - although I believe it prefered Nf3. I put a ?! on the move, because the general plan of a kingside attack is of course very risky, because the white king has no real save square. Would have been interesting to see that happening in the game.