Slight win by enemy blunder.. my good endgame or his blunder?

Atos, don't speak "we" i'm sure that you are the only one that won't let go.. go get a life, atos, and stop trolling on CHESS FORUMS.

End of the case, close this thread due to nameless idiots spamming it off

We idiots aren't nameless!

Speak for yourself.

I do an analysic to his last move, the wrong is his last move(42.Kd4) actually he got many better moves than that, eg:Kb7/Kd7 is not easier to be mated

As I remember, several people objected before I even saw the thread.

Now be a good boy, take down the caps, and wipe your nose.

XD

Atos as i said you should lower your temper a bit and go play chess or something more worth your time than writing stupid and worthless comments to an old thread

Or just play against me and i'll kick your ass xD

You revived your own thread which died from dumbness.

Atos, I think that it's common for a teenager to brag with his game, regardless of it being master piece or not.

He will say it's a masterpiece anyway.

I love when beginners give fully annotated games so we can learn about the deep positional ideas behind the moves.

Masterpiece, no doubt in my mind.

The only person I see here acting his age is the OP.

I'm glad you got the win but next time keep the game to yourself... 

Slight win? Is that like being slightly pregnant?

What they need here is threads FOR certain types:  Beginners posting in beginner's threads, etc.  Having such high level players look over such as this Symphony of Stumbling from two players, both making the stereotypical 'don't do this in the opening/midgame/ending' blunders, is hard to do, tactfully.

I am almost self-taught in chess.  I do well until I play someone like SamaraiChessman, who just absolutely crushes my ignorance of openings and so-called 'theory'.  But I must be pretty decent, since I have actually won a game or two against the big cheeses!

So just don't take stuff so personally.  You posting that game to the considerably high level players is about like my posting something like photography ideas to a Time-Life editor for consideration, I'd imagine.

Hah, I'm only 2 years older than you!

And, no.  You didn't win with your 'good' endgame.  Even Masters can s-t-u-m-b-l-e into a win...or resign when they had a forced position or even mate. Ignatz Von Popiel vs Georg Marco, 1902. -  Philidor Defense: General

FYP :)

To be more constructive: OP, this was not an endgame, it was a middlegame. Of course there's a fine line etc, but Queen+two rooks+bishop vs Queen+rook+bishop is definitely not an endgame.

More blunders and errors were in that game than I care to count. You ask was your victory due to your good play, or your opponents blunder?

To answer that question... Every single game of chess that has a win and a loss has a blunder. Everyone blunders the only way you can win is if your opponent blunders.

Finding your opponents blunder before he finds your blunder is the way you win a chess game.

If I played a game against kasparov and made no mistakes, he couldn't even win. (way easier said than done)

depends on what you define as blunder or mistake. it could be the case that I played perfectly logical moves but they would lack a certain coherence, now which of the 10 slightly incoherent moves would be a blunder? meanwhile Kasparov would have built up a killer attack and I'd just stand in awe and resign.

Thank you for all the comments

I'm not used to people criticizing without even trying to be constructive, and i take that as an insult.. we are all different, don't blame me on that please

Already edited out those things you guys pointed out, thanks

No fezzik, i didn't play nearly my best :)

I have improved greatly, i'm now about 1800 in live chess and i'm currently competeting in a tournament in online chess. Look at the date

So, if you played your best, it would be a masterpiece...