Forums

The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !! 💥

Sort:
MarcoBR444
MarcoBR444
Nov 9, 2015
0
#201

SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING in chess world!

I'm really scaring the guys!!

MarcoBR444
MarcoBR444
Nov 9, 2015
0
#202
With_every_step wrote:
jackfast wrote:

I didn't read all of this Marco guy's comedy skit but it would be quite funny if he were trolling. Sadly I do not think he is... I think he is just retarded...

When his opponent is winning and plays a move Marco can't understand, Marco says that his opponent blundered and now he can easily win when Marco's position is actually completely lost.

Marco says that he only blunders a few times a game whereas I struggle to find one move that Marco played that is not terrible. I don't have enough month to explain to Marco how bad his moves are.

When anyone plays a simple tactic (which is actually usually a blunder but Marco thinks it is a tactic) Marco says that is one of the best moves ever played and it is very brilliant. He then says that all the world champions should worship him and give him a GM title when actually most 1400s can easily explain to Marco hows to refute his move.

I don't have any more time.

You can't be Carlsen to talk like that... Are you Paul Morphy?

Perhaps Bobby Fischer and you're shocked by their use of e4 which seems to underpronounce some of its strengths.

 

I think "jackfast" is one account owned by Magnus Carlsen, Anand or Kramnik.

These GM are afraid of me; they fear if I am getting into the professional chess tournaments then crush them all.

LogoCzar
NM LogoCzar
Show your flair!
Nov 9, 2015
0
#203
MarcoBR444 wrote:
With_every_step wrote:
jackfast wrote:

I didn't read all of this Marco guy's comedy skit but it would be quite funny if he were trolling. Sadly I do not think he is... I think he is just retarded...

When his opponent is winning and plays a move Marco can't understand, Marco says that his opponent blundered and now he can easily win when Marco's position is actually completely lost.

Marco says that he only blunders a few times a game whereas I struggle to find one move that Marco played that is not terrible. I don't have enough month to explain to Marco how bad his moves are.

When anyone plays a simple tactic (which is actually usually a blunder but Marco thinks it is a tactic) Marco says that is one of the best moves ever played and it is very brilliant. He then says that all the world champions should worship him and give him a GM title when actually most 1400s can easily explain to Marco hows to refute his move.

I don't have any more time.

You can't be Carlsen to talk like that... Are you Paul Morphy?

Perhaps Bobby Fischer and you're shocked by their use of e4 which seems to underpronounce some of its strengths.

 

I think "jackfast" is one account owned by Magnus Carlsen, Anand or Kramnik.

These GM are afraid of me; they fear if I am getting into the professional chess tournaments then crush them all.

Say... Didn't I beat you 3:0? Trust me these GMs would crush me every time. Not that you aren't good, when you try you are under-rated 150 points.

MarcoBR444
MarcoBR444
Nov 9, 2015
0
#204
logozar wrote:

Say... Didn't I beat you 3:0? Trust me these GMs would crush me every time. Not that you aren't good, when you try you are under-rated 150 points.

I quite sure when you become a GM ( and I think it is going to happen within 7 years) you will crush Anand, Kramnik, Caruana... Just because you already know MarcoBR444's agressive style of attack!! 

LogoCzar
NM LogoCzar
Show your flair!
Nov 9, 2015
0
#205

Thanks for the compliment! I sure hope so, I train to. Though honestly you did not seem very agressive when you played me. I seemed to have the initiative in all of them. Some advice: You should have better central control or the agressive attack will fail with proper play.

 
 
 
 



LogoCzar
NM LogoCzar
Show your flair!
Nov 9, 2015
0
#206

In the 2nd game the open f file is handy too.

MarcoBR444
MarcoBR444
Nov 9, 2015
0
#207
logozar wrote:

Thanks for the compliment! I sure hope so, I train to. Though honestly you did not seem very agressive when you played me. I seemed to have the initiative in all of them. Some advice: You should have better central control or the agressive attack will fail with proper play.

 

Thanks for the analysis! I think when you become a FM you will be a nice teacher of chess!

LogoCzar
NM LogoCzar
Show your flair!
Nov 10, 2015
0
#208
With_every_step wrote:

To be fair, stating that b3 doesn't 'control the centre' might be misleading, obviously b3 is frequently played to fianchetto a bishop, which is a valid play and doesn't hand over central squares to an opponent. In any case, central control doesn't necessarily lead to strong attacks and can distract from doing so, generally speaking attacks such as the second game were mostly buttressed by the pieces rather than the central pawn doing much other than dislocating one or two pieces, which isn't really the central aspect of such. Likewise, especially at their level Philidor's Defence is hardly going to be an automatic loss. It's possibly more reasonable than things they've played in the past which would more stress central placement of pawns. In all likelihood knight forks, etc., are likely to be an issue whether or not their opponent has occupied themselves with central positioning, encouraging central positioning for unsound attacks to come, or without adequate defensive compensation, might lead to their play becoming too far off from insecurities left by any attacks, let the opponent through the back, etc. As such, not sure that all treatment of this theme was entirely necessary, but nonetheless decent games from them and they probably performed better than usual there.

I am using it as an example, they are reasonable moves but need good follow ups and strategys and wanted to show why my attack worked and his did not.

The moves like b3, d6 were good moves. They just allowed me central control easily and made it harder for him to sucsessfully be "aggressive"

And he did play good! I am not saying he didn't. Certainly not <1000 based on chess.coms rating.

MarcoBR444
MarcoBR444
Nov 11, 2015
0
#209

WHO IS THE KING OF THE PATZERS?!????

The answer is in the game below, with analysis and some comments by Magnus!!

The game was named "Let's solve who is the King of The Patzers" by Petrikeckman, who was the challenging, trying to get my crown of Patzers' King.

This battle easily overcomes the Karpov X Kasparov very known boring draws.


 

 



adumbrate
adumbrate
Nov 11, 2015
0
#210

is that Magnus your little brother?

MarcoBR444
MarcoBR444
Nov 11, 2015
0
#211
skotheim2 wrote:

is that Magnus your little brother?

 

No. Magnus is just a fan.

Dark_Falcon
Dark_Falcon
Nov 11, 2015
0
#212

Quote "Here is the game with FANTASTIC comments !!!"

I like the OP and his funny and fantastic and amazing comments...

Good job man!

Laughing


Samir_91
Samir_91
Nov 11, 2015
0
#213

You are pure legend Cool

dashdo101
dashdo101
Show your flair!
Nov 11, 2015
0
#214

Uhhhh....

MarcoBR444
MarcoBR444
Nov 11, 2015
0
#215
Samir_91 wrote:

You are pure legend 

Yes, I am indeed! Thanks fan! Sent you 2 trophies and 2 for Dark_Falcon #222!

Robert_New_Alekhine
Robert_New_Alekhine
Closed: Inactive
Nov 11, 2015
0
#216

Did you post our game?

MarcoBR444
MarcoBR444
Nov 11, 2015
0
#217
Robert0905 wrote:

Did you post our game?

No. As you are requesting I am going to post; just gimme some hours.

petrikeckman
petrikeckman
Nov 11, 2015
0
#218

This is my analysis of the game and reasons why I lost. (ok, sorry, I can't handle these boards! I wrote a long analysis after the moves, but it is not shown in this board). EDIT: ok, comments have to made here after the board is published not before.

But the main reason is just that Marco did have good luck.

petrikeckman
petrikeckman
Nov 11, 2015
0
#219

Really! What should be done so that the comments before/after move stores, saved somewhere?

petrikeckman
petrikeckman
Nov 11, 2015
0
#220

@Marco: It is just 1-1. There gonna be a the BIG FINAL someday, in BIG Areana or stadium.! Tickets are already selled. 45,99 $