Was that an argue? Hmm...not then the best way...
The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !! 💥
Sort:
Well, if Magnus Carlsen has an overall winning percentage of only 61,9%(**) in his games, of course I lose some games too. Even the KING OF THE PATZERS loses some games!!!
The game below I played against the very strong player Robert0905.
(**) According to chessgames.com; 2015, november, 11.
Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
Nov 14, 2015
0
#266
Thanks for posting Marco :). We should play again sometime.
I think your mistake was on move 6, where you played exd5, and you can see later the pawn on d3 became weak and was eventually lost.
Here: Hard to understand the board in that format for me
And, I would have played 14... Rxd1 but thats just me
At the end down 3 pieces.
Yeah, robert is hard for me to play too. He usually wins.
Quote: " Then I resigned because I was down one piece"
I think, it was 3 pieces in the end, but who cares 
Dark_Falcon wrote:
Quote: " Then I resigned because I was down one piece"
I think, it was 3 pieces in the end, but who cares
yES, LOL ! I edited the post.
Robert0905 wrote:
Thanks for posting Marco :). We should play again sometime.
I think your mistake was on move 6, where you played exd5, and you can see later the pawn on d3 became weak and was eventually lost.
Yes, indeed, that pawn became weak.
jackfast wrote:Dude I checked those games with titled players and computers. You're annotations are ALL wrong. For example g6 on move 15 in game 2 either lead to checkmate or losing blacks queen.
You are wrong.
You can not compare computer and professionals (or wanna-be-professionals players) analysis to low rated players analysis, specially non-professionals.
The pourpose of the games I play is fun. The opponents are amateurs (as I am, despite the fact I am THE KING OF THE PATZERS).
Then, these games I play are so different if you compare to the GM games and the engines games.
jackfast wrote:
So... is this how you respond to all people who use common sense? Accusing them of trying to be the King Of The Reason (not good grammar). Not all people want to be a King.
You accused me to have A BIG EGO and shows my analysis are wrong.
Then you are THE KING OF REASON indeed, because you are always right and need to show it to the world (then you have the big ego here).
Robert0905 wrote:
I CHALLENGE LOGOZAR TO BLITZ
And like usual, he wins. Though he is >2000 at blitz, and blitz is not my strong suit.
jackfast wrote: I got it, I understand what you are saying! I have a big ego because I am correct and I state true facts and you have a small ego because you are wrong and lie.
See ? You say YOU are correct. That is why you are THE KING OF REASON.
I said I have a NORMAL ego because I claimed the title of KING OF PATZERS (and this title was vacant). If I had a BIG EGO, like yours, I was claiming the title of THE KING OF CHESS PLAYERS OF THE WORLD.
Marco is still the King of Blunders, pratzers and mistakes. He made terriple schoking blander. 51. h8=QQe6+ !!!???
petrikeckman wrote:Marco is still the King of Blunders, pratzers and mistakes. He made terriple schoking blander. 51. h8=QQe6+ !!!???
Yes, 2 big blunders... moves 50 and 51.
I had an winning position, but I just confused the squares then played 50... Qb6 instead of Qb5+ and managed to sweep up all white pawns...
Nov 15, 2015
0
#278
Hi, Jackfast. Did you see the trophy I gave you? Brilliant games of yours,by the way.
@petrikeckman
Patzers World ChampionCHIP????
C-C-Coalback wrote:
@petrikeckman
Patzers World ChampionCHIP????
I think you made a good observation.
The game was played for Patzers World ChampionCHIP.
So, it wasn't for the title of THE KING OF PATZERS, then I am STILL the KING.
I believe CHESS.COM STAFF should adjucate here.
So for a while, Petrike is winning the Patzers World ChampionCHIP.
I still have the crown of KING OF PATZERS!
Nice analysis LOGOZAR !!
I really enjoy your comments, you do it in a simple and very interesting way. You really is gonna be a nice teacher of chess.
Two trophies for you!