The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !! 💥
Sort:
jackfast wrote:
MarcoBR444 wrote:
newengland7 wrote:
Marco,
To be fair, I think you should at least inform people who join this thread that you will write them into your own personal chess story and have them saying things that they would not say. Kind of like, "Be warned, writer at work, get too close and you'll be written into the story."
jackfast,
It's all in good fun. I think I've been written into the story as well. Just let Marco have fun. This is his thread.
I do not understand how someone can take it so serious. If someone does not like my post (because I mentioned him/her), just message then I will delete it.
Also keeping this here just in case Marco deletes his post.
Oh, now he tells that was a test. Then that was another clue that Jackfast is my #1 fan indeed.
For you, again, Jackfast:
Against The King of Patzers: only sacrifice a piece if you had an EXCELLENT plan, or you will lose.
The game below, commented by #1 fan JACKFAST, shows this details, in another mastepiece of chess in 30 moves.
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1392330062
if you fight me in online you will lose
NathanielFerneau wrote:
if you fight me in online you will lose
Of course, that is why I am The King of Patzers!!
TWO trophies sent to you.
Dec 20, 2015
0
#606
Could a peasant win against the King of Patzer?
MarcoBR444 The King of Patzers
Brazil
Race is on for 12.5 points.
chess_anonymous wrote:
Could a peasant win against the King of Patzer?
MarcoBR444 The King of Patzers
Brazil
Race is on for 12.5 points.
This match is hard, I am struggling to keep the advantage. Nice games.
jackfast wrote:
I don't think you can call yourself the king of the patzer because I am pretty sure patzer means anyone who doesn't do the subject as a job. That includes a lot of 2500+ players.
No, you are wrong, as always. You need to study harder.
Patzer is a chess players who makes lots of blunders and mistakes then he has a low rating.
Dec 23, 2015
0
#609
Patzer is a player who wins by tricks and traps. Usually quite weak in strategic play.
jackfast wrote:
DIctionary.com say patzer is a casual, amateurish chess player.
2500+ chess patzers can play chess casually, which means not for pay.
2500+ is not a casual, amateur chess player. If someone reach this rating, he studied a lot and played tons of games.
Again: you are always wrong.
I think patzer is a a 1400- player.
The King of Patzers won a game against a 1700 + player !!!!
The chess.com computer showed the following analysis for the game:
Computer Analysis (~2500 strength)
Inaccuracies: 8 = 14.8% of moves
Mistakes: 4 = 7.4% of moves
Blunders: 0 = 0.0% of moves
It means The King of Patzers is really a BRILLIANT CHESS PLAYER, one of the best chess players in all history,
See the analysis below; comments by JACKFAST, the #1 fan of The King.
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1392844744
Dec 23, 2015
0
#612
And here is MARCOBR444's ABSOLUTE BEST GAME!!!!! WINNER OF THE 2015 BEST GAME AWARD!!!!!!!!!
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote: #679 And here is MARCOBR444's ABSOLUTE BEST GAME!!!!! WINNER OF THE 2015 BEST GAME AWARD!!!!!!!!!
The King fails sometimes. Even a KING is not perfect.
THE BOREDOM DOES NOT LIVE IN THE GAMES PLAYED BY THE KING OF PATZERS!!!!!!!!!!
The game below was played against the user "DontBoreMe".
Ok !! Then the King did not bore him and checkmated in only 12 moves.
Another MASTERPIECE by The King of Patzers! Brilliant game! Brilliant tactics! Astonishing chess tricks!!
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1396115117
jackfast wrote: #683 : On a serious note, can you please stop lying about me liking your games. I don't want people to think I am retarded.
Ok, from now I will NOT use your nickname here in the analysis.
IF you want, I can delete the previous post. Just ask if you want.
jackfast wrote:
MarcoBR444 wrote:
jackfast wrote:
DIctionary.com say patzer is a casual, amateurish chess player.
2500+ chess patzers can play chess casually, which means not for pay.
2500+ is not a casual, amateur chess player. If someone reach this rating, he studied a lot and played tons of games.
Again: you are always wrong.
I think patzer is a a 1400- player.
The most likely case is that the player practices and reaches 2500 but then realizes he cannot make money off of chess and just ends up playing it for fun, can a titled player tell me if I am wrong on this?
You are WRONG again and dictionay.com is wrong too.
"DIctionary.com say patzer is a casual, amateurish chess player."
It is not true 100% of the time. A person can play a lot of games, spend hours a day playing chess for years and even though play very badly; blunder a lot, too many mistakes.
very true
lloydknight wrote:
very true
Thanks, it is very true I am the King of Patzers. One trophy sent to you.
Is this a joke!?!?!?!?!