GuessWhoIAm wrote: You missed the simple 3. Nxe5.
Yes!
The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !! 💥
Sort:
no after nxe5 qe7 is the reason
qe7 is the most and the best move after nxe5
Harish73 wrote:
After 3. Nxd5! fxe5, then 4. Qh5+ Ke7 5. Qxe5+ etc is slaughter. For more information, search "Damiano Defence" on Google for a longer, more exciting combination. And shivank2005 was right, 3. ...Qe7 is indeed the best response to prevent the king hunt. Continuing it, 4. Nf3 Qxe4+ 5. Be2 and although Black has regained the pawn, he had also wasted too much time and is severely undeveloped.
Huh? 3. Nxe5 instead of d4. Whu did you miss?
yes! one trophy send to you!!
Trophies sent to you from #997 to #1004 for the analysis!
[COMMENT DELETED]
HahXianMing wrote:
Marco, please make more blogs of your amazing games. I am loving it.
LOL!! I think this thread is enough. I will keep posting the analysis with this style. Thank you note!
me trophy? why?
I am in the 0-0-0 section of the tournament lol
Jan 27, 2016
0
#934
I decided to try my luck against the king of patzers. Luckily, he walked into 1 of my favorite variations; advanced caro-kann with 4.h4 ...h6. Blacks best move is 4..h5. KP played 4..h6 which is OK, but it is my favorite variation to play against and play follows as- 5.g4! followed by the pawn sac 6.e6! National Master Brian Wall went over this line with me in early 2015, and since then I have yet to lose a game in the advanced caro-kann in otb play.
Marco walked right into this and felt overwhelmed from the get go. he mentioned in chat that 'I was the 1 was the 1 doing the brain frying'. However, despite getting into some sharp and tough situations, he was surprisingly resourceful. Much more so than I would expect from a 1300. We were playing moves back and fourth pretty quickly too- so much props to the K of P.
1 side note- I spent a whole bunch of time analyzing the R sac 35. Re6. I was quite pleased with myself to see that it led to atleast me winning the Q down the road. It took quite awhile to calculate and was quite certain marcos would take the R without hesitation. He was online when I played the move, and to my surprise he declined the sac and played the strongest move within about 10 seconds of sending the move out. I was shocked and asked him about it. turns out he hallucinated a 'mate in 1' and didnt even consider taking the free R. I was a bit aggravated by this...but I guess ignorance can be bliss.
I'm not sure of Marco's analysis, butI played the game surprisingly accurate with only 3 mistakes and 1 blunder. The computer analysis is pasted below:
Inaccuracies: 1 = 2.6% of moves
Mistakes: 3 = 7.7% of moves
Blunders: 1 = 2.6% of moves
Mysound wrote: #1010
Nice game. Here is the link
https://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=127050842
About your side note, I think you mean your rook sac in 27 Re6 (35 Re6 was not rook sac).
1 side note- I spent a whole bunch of time analyzing the R sac 35. Re6. I was quite pleased with myself to see that it led to atleast me winning the Q down the road.
When you made 27 Re6, I analysed and first saw I was checkmated, but I was not. That is why I did not take the rook.
Later I saw I could lose my queen.
Good analysis, 2 trophies sent to you!
Jan 28, 2016
0
#937
MarcoBR444 wrote:
Mysound wrote: #1010
Nice game. Here is the link
https://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=127050842
About your side note, I think you mean your rook sac in 27 Re6 (35 Re6 was not rook sac).
1 side note- I spent a whole bunch of time analyzing the R sac 35. Re6. I was quite pleased with myself to see that it led to atleast me winning the Q down the road.
When you made 27 Re6, I analysed and first saw I was checkmated, but I was not. That is why I did not take the rook.
Later I saw I could lose my queen.
Good analysis, 2 trophies sent to you!
Ahh yes, sorry you are of course correct. I threw that note in at the end of the post and just scanned the move list until i saw 'Re6' thinking that was the only 1. Yes, 27.re6! (yes im giving it an exclam lol) is the move I was referring to, and I was super psyched to see that the computer analysis did not mark it as a mistake or blunder ;)
HEY, MYSOUND, I played a game with the same opening - see the diagram below.
The game was played in 10 minutes time control and is full of mistakes and blunders, specially at the end, because I won on time (17 seconds left for me).
http://en.lichess.org/wVoP1TTMYTdq
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote:
Marco, I WANT YOU TO PLAY ME IN LIVE CHESS!
Ok, let's play some 10 min or 15 minutes game live chess!!
I AM GOING TO FRY YOUR BRAIN !!!!!
I love the f7 square, when I am playing white!!!
http://lichess.org/UmLbRijJ
Comments by Magnus