so I was playing around with the analysis and decided to set up this position. But, how? This is not a 3.40 advantage. (Or maybe im wrong)
the time where computers are wrong
Sort:
GM_Parzival1
May 28, 2021
0
#1
May 28, 2021
0
#3
MakeItAQueen wrote:
Look at the knight on g1. If it is worth 3 and it takes a pawn, then black has 2. This is just merely based on material count. Black has superior space control and this stonewall blockade across the board needs to get chomped down on. White can do nothing and hope for repetition. So, black needs to pick a knight and take one of the pawns. Stockfish shows 7+. After taking the d4 pawn for example, via Nc6, if white plays cxd4 black can go after the LSB and use the queen on a6. If white instead plays exd4, then the queen can make use of the b1-h7 diagonal.
After clearing the confusing clutter, white has nothing to combat the stranglehold black has. This is a case where there are too many pieces on the board to easily see the advantage.
???
May 29, 2021
0
#4
marqumax wrote:
U dumb or what? Black has a billion demolition sacrifices to break through
lol
I don't get why to call someone dumb.
May 29, 2021
0
#7
marqumax wrote:
U dumb or what? Black has a billion demolition sacrifices to break through
little_guinea_pig wrote:
because we agree with what you said lol
May 29, 2021
0
#9
marqumax wrote:
U dumb or what? Black has a billion demolition sacrifices to break through
do they work? If they do, then you may facepalm now
May 29, 2021
0
#11
GM_Loser5000 wrote:
credit to JackRoach for the last part
What are you crediting me for? I did nothing.
May 29, 2021
0
#12
JackRoach wrote:
GM_Loser5000 wrote:
credit to JackRoach for the last part
What are you crediting me for? I did nothing.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/this-doesnt-make-sense-60580841 3rd comment
I don't think it's the case to call people dumb and I think the explanation GM_loser gave is very useful, but even then I'm still recreating this in the analysis to check myself how it goes on.
May 29, 2021
0
#14
GM_Loser5000 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
GM_Loser5000 wrote:
credit to JackRoach for the last part
What are you crediting me for? I did nothing.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/this-doesnt-make-sense-60580841 3rd comment
Ah yes. I have the power to make people facepalm.
Yes, I gave it a look and not obvious at all, unless every player under 1400-1500 rating is considered dumb, I had to ask hints for more moves against the 3200 computer than the moves I got right and the ending is a bishop + knight + king vs king endgame, which I experienced before on other sites, but this pc plays better obviously and wasn't even able to corner him in 50 moves, even the hints don't find the right path it seems.
Your position is dead lost for white!
Engines are right!
Because there is minor pieces jump and sacrifice, via Ne5 and Nd3.
If there is a real fortress with no minor pieces sacrifice, then Crystal can see as 0.00.
Jun 10, 2021
0
#18
but that isnt draw by dead position because theres always ways to lose by blundering
Jun 10, 2021
0
#19
This is a draw even though white is down 67 in material, but the computer actually sees this as 0.00.