this is only a survey

No.

Science/maths/logic perhaps more than the artistic/beauty side. However, Anatoly Karpov has said that "in my opinion, anybody who has never appreciated the beauty of chess has never lived". Maybe we should not disagree with Karpov!!

i am a painter and a cook, but if i understand your question correctly, i would say that there are many artists in general that enjoy this game, but i would not say majority of chess players are artists in that sense....so my answer is no.

Yes

Yes

no. I am a mathematician.

A good mathematician might have noticed the difference between 2009 and 2024.

That is definitely true. 2009 = 7^2 x 41 while 2024 = 2^3 x 11 x 23. If we were to test if the Collatz's Conjecture are true for these two numbers, 2024 might be easier since we can get down to 11 x 23 really fast. But I have no clue how many irritations will take each of them to get to 1.

No

(if you’re only including visual art, then no because most people wouldn’t consider themselves visual artists, and probably wouldn’t be much more of less than general population. if you are ascribing the term artist to someone you could argue just about anyone is an artist. If you mean the arts in general, I would argue most people have at least one hobby that could be understood as art. Chess is mathematics, much like how music theory is mathematics too, maybe chess players would be more likely to be interested in playing/understanding music.)

Quite a few irritations, I suspect, magapi being the main one. .

Of course yes

Yes

no

I don't think chess is art, but there's some overlap. Both art and chess are done for the love of doing it, not for monetary compensation.

.

Yes

no

Yes