12241 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I am just questioning what peoples thoughts are because this game went differently than other many others I have played.
10. Move your knight or capture his!
11. b5 wins a piece (back).
12. Same double attack idea as your one at 14, attacking knight and mate. Attacks the rook if the knight moves back to block mate.
14. Is a good double attack but your opponent was more concerned for his rook than his king...
3. ... Bd6 is only playable if you have a way of following through with 4. ... c6 and 5. ... Bc7 (intending ... d5). In this position, 4. ... c6 would be met by 5. d4 cxd4 6. Qxd4, so the Bishop move to d6 is probably bad.
Blueemu is right I think about Bd6, its interesting though with the long term plan of playing d5 yourself and retreating the bishop to c7. I like the way you played, except for dropping a piece unecceary, the two bishops aiming towards the king give you alot of attacking potential.
An example of moving the Bishop to block the d-file, then retreating it to clear the way for the d-Pawn might be:
1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 b6 3. e4 Bb7 4. Bd3 intending Bc2 and d4.
Nice game for your level. I agree with the others though, that Bd6 wasn't good since it blocked the d-pawn even though you seemed to plan to fianchetto your bishop.
Did you plan to sacrifice your knight? It seemed to play perfectly into your win. (Not that it was a good move though.)
I actually did not mean to sac the knight that was an error on my part.
Proof I'm not fake!!
by leklerk1 a few minutes ago
Beginner question: Is there a "method" for analyzing games? (ie. not by computer)
by moogyboy 2 minutes ago
mate in two medium level #2
by kiba13 3 minutes ago
Greatest Attacking Chess Players Of All Time
by fabelhaft 9 minutes ago
Coach Looking for students
by NimzoPatzer 11 minutes ago
Best introductory endgame book?
by SilentKnighte5 33 minutes ago
9/29/2016 - Occupying The Escape Square
by human_robot 35 minutes ago
Download PGN button STOPPED WORKING
by Monster_with_no_Name 35 minutes ago
Excellent idea in the Grunfeld
by leklerk1 51 minutes ago
Why is this bad?
by Lasker1900 60 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!