It’s good that you’re playing and getting experience but you need to revisit some (most/all) of the basics so you can better prioritise what matters.
(also the move you played on move 7 was a random move not a developing move)
But having read through some of your previous responses I suspect this whole thread may be a joke/trolling
I'm rated very low elo, i've only just started playing. I'd say this was my best, i did have another game that may have been better recently but foolishly caused a stalemate rather than a mate by mistake.
did you do an analysis? if so, what did it say? if not, why not? doing an analysis is much more helpful and provides much better feedback than asking random people on forums.
I did it said i had a great move and some errors and such, but most moves it doesn't really say anything.
You dont have too worry much about moves that did not result in meaningful change in standing. Just concentrate on those that did.
It’s good that you’re playing and getting experience but you need to revisit some (most/all) of the basics so you can better prioritise what matters.
(also the move you played on move 7 was a random move not a developing move)
But having read through some of your previous responses I suspect this whole thread may be a joke/trolling
At first I thought this guy was trolling too. But now I'm not at all sure. The guy has a sub 200 rapid rating. Is someone going to maintain such an account and endure such ugly losses just to troll better? The unbelievable part is that he argues with people who are trying to help him...
You did NOT. The guy played Nc6 on move 6, leaving his bishop free to be taken, and you played a random move.
I was developing.