We need more amateurs to post their annotated games.

That's a great game for analysis! The moral of the story is never underestimate your opponent (well, one moral of many)

Nice game !

Thanks! But I have to admit it was more luck than skills :d

Its been a while since a posted a game, so here's a tactical one for you all to analyse and enjoy! :)

I've played and tactically blundered alot of games today, so I am quite happy with this game compared to the other games today.

ok, now I'm gonna put up my best games here, truly the best, even though I lost on time, I reached a winning position against none other than NM ChessNetwork in GAME 2 :)

GAME 1 was terrible, he was definitely better, I had some mistakes, and he played so fast and accurate that I was quickly losing on time and material.

yesterday he was playing against some people and also live streaming, which may cause him to play inaccurately 

GAME 1 

GAME 2

now I hold black against CN, I got my turn after few "number guesses" ;)

he played really good, but I had advantage in time, suddenly he played really well and fast, then both are equal on time, finally I had a piece sac , which I think is a mistake, but both of us makes terrible blunders, after the smoke cleared a bit, I was ahead in material, but still lose on time . Well, maybe next time then 

where's the annotation ? I think the game went pretty well, until your opponent gives the Q for free lol :P

This game is kind of important to me as it is my Highest win, also the end is a nail biter.

can some one analyse my game in post 667

Jetfighter, post 667, you made a hash of the ending. You said it was an easy technical win, and it is, but why let his pawn race down the board. Look up Queen vs 7th-rank-pawn theory.

Here's the ending:

Good game.

well checkmate was my goal, and I would have accomplished it soon enough

Congrats!   Note how dumb computer lost coordination of its pieces - your

kingside pawn moves and threats and its dumb rook checks pushed it over the horizon.

Nice game. You had very good control over the play. All the moves you did had specific reason and you made no mistake for your opponent to work on, while you maintained the initiative and attacked well.

Thanks both

Dear jetfighter, on your game in post 667, I anaylsed it on Fritz for you.

4.Nf3 would be better than c3. After all, after cxd4 cxd4, the d4 pawn becomes a weakness. Forgive me if im wrong though, as im not very familiar with the French.

6.Be3. Watch out for Qb6 after this move.

7.exf6 I feel this is a bad move (and so does Fritz) because it loses tempo after Nxf6. Notice you have 2 tempi compared to Black with 4. Fritz's analysis says you're losing half a pawn after Nxf6.

36. Ke4. What would you do after Bc6+?

I wont analyse any further, but for advice,

- Before you move a piece, ask yourself if it is safe to move there, to avoid giving free pieces.

- Try to place your pawns on the opposite colour of opponent's Bishop, if he has only one Bishop left.

That's all I have. Other than that, great game!

Good luck for the future :)

at the begining I was worried about those, And decided to just try it and see what happens, I was worried about the Bc6+ threat a lot, and decided that the only way for me to salvage any thing was just to hope nothing bad happens

Well, it seems you like to play lots of Bongcloud and 960 games. Try to avoid playing those too much.

I have quit 960, hate the oppening set ups, Bongcloud is just to improve tactics, How to get my King to the other side can be switched out with How can I checkmate my opponent faster, but I don't do those often because I don't want to loose my head.