Sometimes I don't understand why the game ended in a draw when I had a clear advantage.
Why a draw?
Sort:
I played black.
I also play here quite often. The site offers a wide selection of games and great deals that might interest you, plus simple rules without any complicated fine print.
Feb 25, 2026
0
#4
In your last game you didn’t attacked the king but when you look he couldn’t go anywhere and that’s called a stelmate
Feb 25, 2026
0
#5
GarrisonEM wrote:
Sometimes I don't understand why the game ended in a draw when I had a clear advantage.
Sometimes I don't understand why the game ended in a draw when I had a clear advantage.
its because the white king had no place to move after you made your move, it does not matter if you had 5 queens( if ) , if the challenged has no place to run its concidered a draw, basically if the king cant not make a legal move or has no piece that can move for it, its a draw, hence, stalemate.
White has no legal move.
Therefore its a stalemate.
Therefore its a draw.
A stalemate is a popular way to get a draw out of a lost position.
Fun fact: black had mate-in-1 on move 47 and 48 and 49 and 50 and 51.
It's a stalemate. like others already said, white had no legal moves but the king wasn't in check, so by the rules it's a draw even if you had a big material advantage. You can also check out this website, which has interesting games with simple controls and easy-to-understand rules.
magipi wrote:
Fun fact: black had mate-in-1 on move 47 and 48 and 49 and 50 and 51.
I find the mutual brilliancy at move 29/30 more fun.
