Well, I did some extra analysis and learned a lot. It is really a "game changer" for me.
I never expected that the early development and Knight at e5 (in this case) could be so powerful.
I tiny delay in development almost blocks blacks Knight and Rook at a8, b8 and white always threatening a fork by a knight from e5 making very pushing attacks by bishops.
All this about development and pace; blacks just always one move behind and can't catch up, always forced to find precise defensive moves to avoid a worse situation.
Live and learn.
If somebody could add something to analysis of this amazing position, please do.
For me it would be a point to reconsider the chess game at all; so, I believe, the analysis will help many beginners to see how the development and pace is important.
Hi
I just lost the https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/27207131457 and I am totally understand it; that's fine. What I don't understand is the computer analysis.
It doesn't show the 12. Ne4 as a blunder after which the knight and the bishop fall to the pin from pawn; in the contrary, analysis say that this is the best move. Well, I though that I could have missed some trick to get out from this pin, but the only thing analysis suggests is:
12. ... d5
13. Bb3 de
14. de Bxe4
Now is the most interesting part: I lack a knight for nothing the analysis assess this as a draw.
Being this in the ending, I could suspect that the combination could lead to some compensation. But lacking a knight in this in all other meanings equal position seems hopeless.
Am I missing something or this is just a mistake in the analysis' engine?