idicmeicu wrote:
why does it say that i got a brilliant in the move reaval at the end of the game but there was no brilliant
I don't know why but here it is.
why does it say that i got a brilliant in the move reaval at the end of the game but there was no br
Sort:
I think that the depth of search is different between the move breakdowns and the analysis. So sometimes the have a differing opinion. Also, dont forget to manually analyse the game and leave the engine on for a few moments, you may find better lines that the quick evaluation overlooked.
the algorithm is trash. thats all. a brilliant move is not necessarily a sacrifice.
16 hrs ago
0
#5
Hochdeutscher wrote:
the algorithm is trash. thats all. a brilliant move is not necessarily a sacrifice.
Chess com understands that. If you read what they write when they made the change to the brilliancy definition back in 2021, they explained the decision to use a good sacrifice over the very difficult to define actual brilliancy.
And the further decision to lower the requirements for a brilliancy based on ratings.
why does it say that i got a brilliant in the move reaval at the end of the game but there was no brilliant