Why is there a face instead of a accuracy on my review

Quote from IM Levy Rozman "A brilliant move is not brilliant if you don't understand it.

But still, it's funny how blunder can be brilliant moves. When I solve a very complicated daily puzzle, I just try all the sacrifices I can find.

Not die, They will perish into tears and will kill the person who played it.

This person why sacrificing a knight

Stockfish: BRILLIANT !!!!

Me when sacrificing my queen

Stockfish: BEST MOVE

:scream

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/78925292587?tab=review

Why did i not get a brilliant

According to inverse Stockfish, this is currently the worst possible game (that doesn't end in a draw). Both players get the danny_omg image instead of percentage.

I got the face in a game where I played d4 and opponent resigned in an arena game. When I game reviewed it was a face

My opponent got this face

I got 0.7 percent accuracy in a game against a bot but I can't get low enough to get the face.

I played my first game in a while... and I somehow got a worse report card score than either player in that game (900 both)

This saddens me.

0% cant be possible...

So incredible Game Link: https://www.chess.com/game/live/80926310275

Plus if u want game review take this: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/80926310275?tab=review

well why are you even getting a 0% accuracy

honestly I think that seeing what bots can get it is fun the barbarian did not get it on my game but the goblin did!!!???

supertert i found you on the internet

The pressure of blitz really gets to me. I had a strong attack but kept hanging mate in one.

A face means an accuracy so low, IM Danny Rensch was shocked and is screaming at you. This is an easter egg.