Why were these moves considered mistakes/blunders?

Sort:
hikarunaku

If you cannot interpret why the engine says your move is a blunder or a mistake then the best way to understand it is by playing a few moves according to the variation which the engine suggests.

kthprog
Qoko wrote:

@kthprog As thumb rule, if you aren't sure why just check the analysis itself! It gives you the better move, and indeed, chess improvements consist of finding a stronger winning move or not losing so that accounts for both (ie 9.0-0? Bxc3 -+ and 15....Qxe5? +- (also thumb rule, the exposed queen on e5 in the French structures is rarely good)).

As for the opening, anti-positional moves are played; I've played the French for quite a while and the structure turns out non-French early on.

 

 

How is the French defense generally supposed to be played and why? Thanks happy.png

TimothyScottPuente

9. 0-0 leaves the bishop hanging after 9...Bxc3

Isn't engine saying 8.Ne5 is dubious.

I only looked at that game a short time. It isn't even worth analyzing.

Ciao,

Timothy Scott Puente

kthprog
hikarunaku wrote:

If you cannot interpret why the engine says your move is a blunder or a mistake then the best way to understand it is by playing a few moves according to the variation which the engine suggests.

I think I need to learn the analysis tool a bit better. I was trying other moves but it took too long for it to calculate if the move was better or not.