100% Accuracy!
You can hardly label a strong, virtually winning move (4.Bf4) as "first mistake", unless you are completely clueless (and which seems to be the case indeed).
Alright, so bb4 is not really a mistake to be honest. because after kc3, qxb2, bd2 white is fine. But white playing Qd2 is definitely a blunder, there is absolutely NO! reason to TRADE QUEENS the thought of that kind of throws away all kinds of logic in the englund gambit, but besides that very cool line, your oppenent definitely fell for it. But keep studing the lines, it will get harder to achieve as you climb the rating ladder otherwise cool game.
You can hardly label a strong, virtually winning move (4.Bf4) as "first mistake", unless you are completely clueless ( and which seems to be the case indeed).
Why do you always insult people on the forums?
Alright, so bb4 is not really a mistake to be honest. because after kc3, qxb2, bd2 white is fine. But white playing Qd2 is definitely a blunder, there is absolutely NO! reason to TRADE QUEENS the thought of that kind of throws away all kinds of logic in the englund gambit, but besides that very cool line, your oppenent definitely fell for it. But keep studing the lines, it will get harder to achieve as you climb the rating ladder otherwise cool game.
"You can hardly label a strong, virtually winning move (4.Bf4) as "first mistake", unless you are completely clueless (and which seems to be the case indeed)."
Like IM @pfren, and @frosty21p both said Bf4 Is a pretty good move. Yes, yes it is, but I count that as a bad move due to Qb4+.
But yes, agreed, It's a fairly Decent move.
4. Bf4 is more or less the main line for white and is a winning line for white. After Qb4+ black can play 5. Bd2 and after 5. Qxb2 and 6.Nc3 white is winning. Just so you know, it's the top engine move (shared with Bg5, based on SF 14 depth 35) and gives a decisive advantage to white even after Qb4+. If your opponent knows their lines. Otherwise, you just steamroll them.
As in your example: 5. Qd2 is indeed a massive blunder. As is 6.Qc3. And 7.Bc1 too. Easy win.
Alright, so bb4 is not really a mistake to be honest. because after kc3, qxb2, bd2 white is fine. But white playing Qd2 is definitely a blunder, there is absolutely NO! reason to TRADE QUEENS the thought of that kind of throws away all kinds of logic in the englund gambit, but besides that very cool line, your oppenent definitely fell for it. But keep studing the lines, it will get harder to achieve as you climb the rating ladder otherwise cool game.
Your Nc3 drops the f4 bishop.
You can hardly label a strong, virtually winning move (4.Bf4) as "first mistake", unless you are completely clueless (and which seems to be the case indeed).
Wow. You know, this comment would almost be understandable if you were replying to someone even remotely close to your rating, but you're not, and it's pathetic. To the original poster, great game!
great game!
as your oppnents get smarter, you may wanna move to, the Albin gambit, the Budapest gambit, the Benko Gambit, and, at last, the Nimzo-Indian.
great game!
as your oppnents get smarter, you may wanna move to, the Albin gambit, the Budapest gambit, the Benko Gambit, and, at last, the Nimzo-Indian.
Okay, I'll look at that. Thanks.
Ah it seems the game has been edited to NOT 100% accuracy
Thre's the proof for the non-belivers > https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/27871848109